Jeff Tittel: Chris Christie declares war on the Highlands | Commentary | -- Your State. Your News.

Mar 27th
  • Login
  • Create an account
  • Search
  • Local Business Deals

Jeff Tittel: Chris Christie declares war on the Highlands


Governor Christie has opened a new front on his war on the environment with his appointments to the Highlands Council. The governor's appointments made to Highlands Council are clearly a message that he does not care about protecting the water supply of the people of New Jersey.

The governor should be ashamed of himself with the appointments he made for the Highlands Council. Not only do the vast majority of these appointees oppose the Highlands Act, but they also oppose the protection of our water as well. These appointments along with budgets cuts, other weakenings and attacks put the Highlands and our water supply at risk.

Many of the appointees have extremist views and have actively campaigned against the Highlands Act. For instance, the governor replaced Tracy Carluccio, an environmentalist, with Sam Race, an extremist. Not only has Sam Race opposed the Highlands Act, but his town council has refused to conform to the Highlands Plan and opposed other important regulations to protect our water ways. The majority of the people that have been nominated to the Highlands Council are leaders of organizations such as the Highlands Conservation Association, which is made up of land speculators and developers and the Farm Bureau. The Highlands Conservation Association, Farm Bureau and other organizations have sued to overturn the Highlands Act. Now they are being appointed to implement a law that they tried to get rid of. They will not try to implement the law they will try to overturn the law as members of the Highlands Council. Of the seven appointments, only one has an environmental background, Mike Sebetich.


Governor Christie did not appoint any elected official from Bergen or Passaic county. These are counties with elected officials that have constantly supported the Highlands Act. Not only are there no elected officials, but there is not one representative of Bergen County on the Council. Sussex County, which is only a quarter of the population of Bergen County, has three elected officials on the Council. Warren County, with only an eighth of the population of Bergen County, has two elected officials on the Council. The almost 900,000 people of Bergen County that depend on the Highlands for drinking water do not have one member on the council. With the way this council is set up they never will, which is not only bad for the environment, but bad for democracy.

The people of New Jersey should be alarmed that the governor is now skeptical about clean drinking water. The Highlands are a drinking source for 5.4 million people in New Jersey and one of the last areas of open space we have left. A clean water supply is vital to our state's economy, as our three biggest industries -- pharmaceutical, petro chemical, food production, and tourism -- depend on it to thrive.

A 2004 study by the North Jersey District Water Supply Commission concluded that if the Highlands were to be developed, it would cost $50 billion more to treat our water. This is just a continuation of the Christie attack on the Highlands. Highlands funding has been slashed dramatically — reduced from $12 million to $4.4 million in 2011. Governor Christie is cutting $18 million in grants for municipalities to help them conform to the Highlands Regional Master Plan. He is also cutting $12 million from the Highlands Stabilization Fund to towns in the Highlands to help meet budgetary shortfalls. Highlands Staffing will also be cut by $800,000, resulting in fewer staff people to help towns conform to Highlands Plan and to manage the Transferable Development Rights program. Removing the funding doesn't make sense unless the goal is to kill the Highlands Plan and weaken protections in the Highlands.

The Board of Public Utilities approved PSE&G's expansion of the proposed power lines through the Highlands and a second pipeline was proposed earlier this month. These lines will cut through the Highlands, not only leaving a scar on the land, but affecting our drinking water by going through the Monksville Reservoir and the Pequannock and Wanaque watershed. This pipeline will bring gas from the Marcellus Shale, threatening to destroy the Delaware River Basin because of all the toxic chemicals from fracking.

The Christie Administration may not outright repeal the Highlands Act, but it might restrict its implementation, eliminate its funds, stack the board with pro-development members and weaken DEP regulations, making it essentially meaningless. The Highlands Act was passed to protect the drinking water for more than half of the people in New Jersey, and Governor Christie's budget cuts and executive orders put that drinking water at risk.

The governor is playing politics with the drinking water for people of New Jersey. He would rather appoint people from special interests and political extremists to the Highlands Council than protect our drinking water. Some of the views of the people appointed would make the Tea Party blush. By the governor playing politics, he is not only affecting the environment and water supply, but the economy, as many of our industries are dependent on clean water from the Highlands.

Jeff Tittel is the Director of the New Jersey Chapter of the Sierra Club.


Comments (7)
7 Wednesday, 15 December 2010 10:25
Jack Horsefield
The argument that 'as farmers, we are still able to farm our lands so what's the issue?' is a little too simplistic. Here is the reality:

If due to an illness or some unforeseen circumstance, our family is unable to farm our land for a year, we will lose our farm tax status and will be re-assessed by our town. Re-assessed to what? basically our property can be taxed as residential and tax us right into a tax sale. You say: That can't be true 'its a farm'. Ahhh but the Highlands act allows for land transfer rights which basically means that if, by some lucky stroke, some building occurs in an urban area, its possible that a higher density building plan would be allowed and the difference in profit would go to repay a farmer for the lost value in their land.

The town in which our farm is located therefore says: See?! they can still be considered residential because of the land transfer repayment potential. All of which is outside of our farms control but somehow you consider this fair and equate it with your property sale and use potential?? Your sale of your property is based on your property's value, our value is based on some hypothetical high density property sale in urban NJ that we have 0 input on that may never happen. And you still say fair and OK?!

This is absolutely an unfunded state land grab. And to you simpletons who think its so black and white - read the law and understand it before you chime in on 'greedy farmers'.
6 Thursday, 09 December 2010 11:00
Charlie Western
But its a farm... so its value is based on its ability to be farmed, not developed... if you value your property based on some hypothetical development value, then heck I want to take a second mortgage against my home which could be developed into high-rise office complexes, a shopping mall and a casino. If I can't build a casino on my property, Its a TAKING!
5 Sunday, 05 December 2010 09:19
My township did the same...from 5 acre to 7.5 acre zoning. No one complained about it. The township should be in charge of zoning. The value of the land was still intact. One home allowed on 88 acres is a different thing. Your 401K has probably recovered. Our land value will never recover. The state took it. The state should pay for it.
4 Friday, 03 December 2010 12:57
Charlie Western
My town re-zoned about 10 years ago and we have since seen a lot less development. I don't see a difference here. None of our residents sued the town or questioned the constitutionality of the zoning change. Its part of the right of the town to deal with land use issues. The State saw a compelling need to protect agricultural areas in Northern New Jersey and farmers, it seems, would rather see their land subdivided into mic-mansion land. My 401k took a hit like you couldnt image as well. Tough times for everyone, but calling yourself a farmer and acting like a developer is pretty conspicuous.
3 Wednesday, 01 December 2010 16:54
Well, many farmers have to borrow money each Spring to plant and livestock, etc. When the value of the land went down, the banks no longer will loan. Also, people like me who are older and ready to retire have counted on the value of our land to fund our retirement. We have no 401K. There aren't a lot of people out there interested in purchasing a 200 acre farm to farm it!
2 Wednesday, 01 December 2010 12:37
Charlie Western
I don't understand the "taking" issue. If youre a farmer and a bill passed that protects farmland and prevents overdevelopment, wouldn't you be happy that you can still farm in an area that is bucolic and has a nearby tractor's supply store? Its farmland right... so the value of your land is a farm... and you can still farm it and sell it as a farm? This is why I never understood the Farm Bureau's issues in the Highlands... its an organization to protect farmers and the Highlands Act does exactly that by maintaining farmland as farmland. Why oppose a bill that protects your constituents way of life?
1 Tuesday, 30 November 2010 16:15
Governor Christie should be ashamed? I don't think so. You should be ashamed for promoting the taking of the value of our land! Some of our families have been here for generations, and this taking is a sin. We'd love to save the water, but why should property owners have to pay with their land value? It's not fair and I hope the Governor Christie will right this wrong! He's on the right track.

Add your comment

Your name:

Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509