newjerseynewsroom.com

Wednesday
May 16th

N.J. bear hunt was warranted and environmentally sound

mauroAnthony121211_optBY ANTHONY P. MAURO SR.
COMMENTARY

Year after year it seems that the same few animal activists write letters about their belief that a bear hunt is unwarranted and unfounded because it will not help to manage bears in the state of New Jersey. But the truth is that we have to overlook some very compelling evidence to the contrary in order to cultivate such faith.

Firstly, to reach the conclusion of the animal activist we would need to disagree with the findings of both a Superior Court and Appellate Court, each ruling that the State of New Jersey had put together a viable, comprehensive bear management plan. The two courts agreed that the hunt should proceed.

People would also need a deaf ear to avoid hearing the pervading wisdom of biologists, wildlife managers, and State agencies across America that argue persuasively in favor of hunting as one of several necessary bear management tools.

To agree with the conclusion of the animal activist we would also have to close our eyes to the negative psychological effects associated with human-bear conflicts in residential, commercial, and camping situations. It requires an exceptional degree of callousness in order to ignore claims of economic loss caused by bears to agriculture related businesses. This insensitivity would also extend to financial harm that would befall employers and employees of hotels, camps, and other businesses as a result of lost tourism should a bear-human conflict result in injury or worse.

To agree with the animal activist requires us to show complete disregard for human safety. There would need to be ignorance about the ways black bears respond to periods of declining food sources, and a lack of understanding about the perils associated with bear habituation. These are reasons for increased bear-human conflicts. They may in fact be the cause of recent livestock and pet deaths by black bears as well as reports of physical encounters between bears and humans.

It is the goal of animal activists to promote the rights of bears but to do so at the expense of the public health is emotional thinking; a sign of difficulty in distinguishing between emotions and thoughts. It may be the reason for the recent sensational claims by animal activists that the bear hunt is a grand conspiracy of New Jersey’s Governor to curry favor with hunters, roll back environmental progress and turn over the Garden State to developers and polluters. It is a radical accusation regardless of its origin.

Emotional thinking may also be the spark that ignited a handful of activists to hold a bear hunt protest in Trenton. They lectured using spurious claims based on manipulated data and research. It even earned them the “Pants on Fire” award from PolitiFact, the truth watchdog arm of the Star-Ledger. It is a distinction awarded to those making ridiculous statements.

Finally, for the animal activist to believe that during a time of dwindling habitat and prolific bear population expansion that bear-human conflict can be managed solely by garbage containment and public education is to defy common sense and rely on wishful thinking. While limiting food sources and educating the public about black bears is useful it does nothing to address the primary reasons for increased bear-human conflicts; bear population expansion, loss of habitat, and habituation. Hunting is the tool that addresses these causes.

The New Jersey Outdoor Alliance believes that a black bear hunt is a responsible, pragmatic, environmentally sound, and a science-based method for bringing the black bear population in line with the cultural carrying capacity of available habitat, which is the goal of environmental stewards. It also provides food for the hunter and his or her family while aversively conditioning bears, which provides a measure of lasting public safety.

Anthony P. Mauro Sr. is the Chairman and Cofounder of the New Jersey Outdoor Alliance, New Jersey Outdoor Alliance Conservation Foundation, and New Jersey Outdoor Alliance Environmental Projects each dedicated to conservation and environmental stewardship. He is also an author on the subject of conservation.

ALSO BY ANTHONY P. MAURO SR.

Animal rights activists are negative people but deserve compassion

 
Comments (9)
9 Thursday, 15 December 2011 10:02
TiredOfIdoitsTryingtoMake$$OffInnocentAnimals
Mauro probably could write an article justifying wife beating too.
8 Wednesday, 14 December 2011 10:35
LMG
Says it all
7 Wednesday, 14 December 2011 09:58
Smiddy Wesson
Listen to the pinkos trying to malign our freedom of the 2nd amendment. Why just he other day I saw a catamount, mountain lion, here in Warren County. I fear for my wife and chidren out there in the yard, so I pack major heat for any threat foreign or domestic. You should to lest the pinkos have their way.
6 Wednesday, 14 December 2011 09:00
John LaRue
It seems silly to complain about a bear hunt that is actually part of the left wing agenda to incorporate socialism throughout our great country. These "bears" are socialist instigators and need to be put down before their ursine kind run rampant in our great state.
he flies to africa to kill. that is how important murdering animals is to him. if that isnt distorted thinking, i dont know what is. justifying killing animals is disgusting. i value nature and nature's creaturs alot. they have a hard life in nj where all their land has been taken from them and they have to deal with slime like mauro, who wants to kill kill kill.
4 Wednesday, 14 December 2011 06:06
Steven Black
Someone finally says what the rest of us know. Kudos Mr. Mauro. It looks as though you have a good animal rights following too.
3 Tuesday, 13 December 2011 16:12
Mark Matthews
The term 'conservation' is used INTENTIONALLY to convince the public that because of their virtuous 'stewardship', wildlife and environment are protected and preserved. Conservation as realistically defined in their terminology is synonymous with 'sport' hunting.
2 Tuesday, 13 December 2011 15:39
Mark Matthews
Regrettably, Mr. Mauro neglected to include in his credentials his website, www.ammoland.com. On the 'Ammoland' website, you may learn about "our comprehensive Ammunition, Firearms and Shooting Directory listing all the top destination Gun and Ammo related websites, communities and MFGs and you can quickly see why Ammoland.com is the most popular home page for Hunters and Shooters."

If there is anyone who does not see an AGENDA here, perhaps you need to have your eyes and head examined. This is the pro-gun lobby at work, submitting full page 'commentary' and actually managing to sound like legitimate 'stewards of the land', when their only interest is to sell more guns, more hunting licenses, and pursue their interests via the Div. of Fish & Wildlife, aka, New Jersey private hunting club. The LAST thing New Jersey needs is more guns of any kind!

The term 'conservation' is used erroneously to convince the public that because of their virtuous 'stewardship', wildlife and environment are protected and preserved. Conservation as realistically defined in their terminology is synonymous with 'sport' hunting. Hunter recruitment with increased sales in guns and ammunition is the name of THEIR game.
1 Tuesday, 13 December 2011 14:43
KayRepresentNJ
First of all the current Black Bear Management policy allows the killing of a "nuisance" bear any time of year in NJ. Bears are killed any time for "scaring" campers, for being too close to residential areas or for eating crops. This hunt was CLEARLY for "trophies". Instead of emotion, there are many facts which support this- including the fact that DFW sold 6853 permits for less than 2100 square miles of open hunt space. Tics and stink bugs have done more harm to New Jerseyans than bears have ever done.
Second, the corrupt behavior of our politicians and judges from the state to federal level, leaves little reason to be in awe of a court decision. DFW didn't even honor the cour'ts decision on Sat 12/10/11.
Last it is a fact that the numbers are fabricated. There were no more than 10 bears brought in at the Franklin tag station on Sat 12/10/11, but the NJDFW posted "18". Either they can't count or they are lying to all of us- including the hunting community.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**