BY ANTHONY P. MAURO SR.
COMMENTARY
Year after year it seems that the same few animal activists write letters about their belief that a bear hunt is unwarranted and unfounded because it will not help to manage bears in the state of New Jersey. But the truth is that we have to overlook some very compelling evidence to the contrary in order to cultivate such faith.
Firstly, to reach the conclusion of the animal activist we would need to disagree with the findings of both a Superior Court and Appellate Court, each ruling that the State of New Jersey had put together a viable, comprehensive bear management plan. The two courts agreed that the hunt should proceed.
People would also need a deaf ear to avoid hearing the pervading wisdom of biologists, wildlife managers, and State agencies across America that argue persuasively in favor of hunting as one of several necessary bear management tools.
To agree with the conclusion of the animal activist we would also have to close our eyes to the negative psychological effects associated with human-bear conflicts in residential, commercial, and camping situations. It requires an exceptional degree of callousness in order to ignore claims of economic loss caused by bears to agriculture related businesses. This insensitivity would also extend to financial harm that would befall employers and employees of hotels, camps, and other businesses as a result of lost tourism should a bear-human conflict result in injury or worse.
To agree with the animal activist requires us to show complete disregard for human safety. There would need to be ignorance about the ways black bears respond to periods of declining food sources, and a lack of understanding about the perils associated with bear habituation. These are reasons for increased bear-human conflicts. They may in fact be the cause of recent livestock and pet deaths by black bears as well as reports of physical encounters between bears and humans.
It is the goal of animal activists to promote the rights of bears but to do so at the expense of the public health is emotional thinking; a sign of difficulty in distinguishing between emotions and thoughts. It may be the reason for the recent sensational claims by animal activists that the bear hunt is a grand conspiracy of New Jersey’s Governor to curry favor with hunters, roll back environmental progress and turn over the Garden State to developers and polluters. It is a radical accusation regardless of its origin.
Emotional thinking may also be the spark that ignited a handful of activists to hold a bear hunt protest in Trenton. They lectured using spurious claims based on manipulated data and research. It even earned them the “Pants on Fire” award from PolitiFact, the truth watchdog arm of the Star-Ledger. It is a distinction awarded to those making ridiculous statements.
Finally, for the animal activist to believe that during a time of dwindling habitat and prolific bear population expansion that bear-human conflict can be managed solely by garbage containment and public education is to defy common sense and rely on wishful thinking. While limiting food sources and educating the public about black bears is useful it does nothing to address the primary reasons for increased bear-human conflicts; bear population expansion, loss of habitat, and habituation. Hunting is the tool that addresses these causes.
The New Jersey Outdoor Alliance believes that a black bear hunt is a responsible, pragmatic, environmentally sound, and a science-based method for bringing the black bear population in line with the cultural carrying capacity of available habitat, which is the goal of environmental stewards. It also provides food for the hunter and his or her family while aversively conditioning bears, which provides a measure of lasting public safety.
Anthony P. Mauro Sr. is the Chairman and Cofounder of the New Jersey Outdoor Alliance, New Jersey Outdoor Alliance Conservation Foundation, and New Jersey Outdoor Alliance Environmental Projects each dedicated to conservation and environmental stewardship. He is also an author on the subject of conservation.
ALSO BY ANTHONY P. MAURO SR.
Animal rights activists are negative people but deserve compassion

Twitter
Myspace
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Slashdot
Furl
Yahoo
Technorati
Newsvine
Facebook
If there is anyone who does not see an AGENDA here, perhaps you need to have your eyes and head examined. This is the pro-gun lobby at work, submitting full page 'commentary' and actually managing to sound like legitimate 'stewards of the land', when their only interest is to sell more guns, more hunting licenses, and pursue their interests via the Div. of Fish & Wildlife, aka, New Jersey private hunting club. The LAST thing New Jersey needs is more guns of any kind!
The term 'conservation' is used erroneously to convince the public that because of their virtuous 'stewardship', wildlife and environment are protected and preserved. Conservation as realistically defined in their terminology is synonymous with 'sport' hunting. Hunter recruitment with increased sales in guns and ammunition is the name of THEIR game.
Second, the corrupt behavior of our politicians and judges from the state to federal level, leaves little reason to be in awe of a court decision. DFW didn't even honor the cour'ts decision on Sat 12/10/11.
Last it is a fact that the numbers are fabricated. There were no more than 10 bears brought in at the Franklin tag station on Sat 12/10/11, but the NJDFW posted "18". Either they can't count or they are lying to all of us- including the hunting community.