Share this
Twitter
Myspace
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Slashdot
Furl
Yahoo
Technorati
Newsvine
Facebook
Export PDF
Print
E-mail
Tags
BY PATRICK MURRAY
COMMENTARY
The latest Monmouth University/Gannett New Jersey Poll contains some mixed news for Governor Christie's budget. The public may see it as tough, but not necessarily fair. Two-thirds of New Jerseyans say that the proposed cuts will disproportionately hurt some New Jerseyans, mainly the middle class, the poor, and ... teachers.
When Governor Christie unveiled his budget, he made a specific effort to single out the NJEA as one of the primary opponents to fiscal reform. He basically dared them to oppose his cuts. The governor needed to identify an enemy in his fight to cut costs, and the NJEA was it.
The New Jersey Education Association is the state's largest teachers' union, with more than 200,000 members. The governor rightly assumed that the NJEA's leadership would retrench, opposing any and all changes to their current contract provisions and benefits. However, Christie wrongly assumed that he could isolate the intransigent union leadership from their membership and win over public support.
Our latest poll finds that many state residents side with the union in this fight. Overall, more New Jerseyans blame the governor rather than the local unions or school boards for the inevitable teacher layoffs next year. This is despite the fact that only a handful of local unions agreed even to consider wage freezes as an alternative to job cuts.
The governor was warned this could happen. Here's why.
More than one-in-five New Jersey households include either a teacher or another state worker (who have also been on the receiving end of the governor's wrath). Another 1-in-4 Garden State households do not have public employees, but they do include kids who are taught by these teachers. That means nearly half of the New Jersey public is probably predisposed to sympathize with the teachers in this fight.
The poll results bear this out. When asked who is to blame for the impending workforce cuts at local schools, 57% of those in teacher or state worker households and 45% of parents blame Christie more than any other party in the process. Only among the other half of the New Jersey public - i.e. those who don't have a teacher, state worker, or child in their home - does the governor (36%) share the blame with the teachers' unions (33%).
The problem may be that the governor came out swinging just a little too hard when he decided to make an example of the NJEA. Back in January, columnist Charles Stiles described Christie as "licking his chops" at the prospect of taking on the teachers' union. This may have made some New Jerseyans uncomfortable.
Teachers educate our children, for crying out loud. Sure, there are some long in the tooth, tenured ones who are just phoning it in. But most teachers are caring, concerned individuals who happen to have their own families to feed. Right?
I'm not saying that Christie should have avoided taking on the NJEA at all. Most objective observers would agree that the union has been less than cooperative with local school boards trying to keep job losses to a minimum. But the battle needs to be engaged more shrewdly.
The public's predisposition to sympathize with teachers was always going to be the NJEA's secret weapon. The union leadership knew how to play up that asset, using everything from TV and radio commercials to messages - some subliminal, some explicit - conveyed in the classroom.
The war is certainly not over, but the NJEA seems to have won the first battle in the court of public opinion.
As his term progresses, Chris Christie would do well to remember the words of Oscar Wilde: "A man can't be too careful in the choice of his enemies."
Patrick Murray, Camden County native, is the director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute.
ALSO BY PATRICK MURRAY
Is Christie selling gimmicks in his ‘no gimmicks' budget?
Patrick Murray: Chris Christie making all the right moves before pain hits home in New Jersey
Christie and Obama: Who can fix government for middle class?
New Jersey gay marriage not likely to get voters up in arms
Change without hope doesn't work for Chris Christie
More going on with New Jersey voters than Christie supporters shifting to Daggett
Campaign review: Corzine, Christie stuck to their plans
Independent Chris Daggett gets some credit for his plan to reduce New Jersey's property tax
New Jersey's problems are too serious right now to entertain any more of this campaign nonsense
Corzine's path to a victory over Christie is to win ugly
We wouldn't have to work so many hours to pay such high taxes, and could spend more time with our children if it was not so expensive to send them to lousy public schools. And, even if your kids don't go to public schools, or even if you don't have any kids, you're paying for this crap institution that's supposedly "for the children".
Yeah, they're for the children... So much in fact, that if they don't get their way, they will immediately abandon them, while you're paying through the nose regardless. What a crock.
I can't run my house or business if I am in dept over my head before the creditors put me in bankruptcy.I know what I am taking about because 1975 I declaired BANKRUP becuse of the union workers.
KEEP the heat on these bumb's and cut cut cut until there is a balance budget. PUT them all on 100 commission like I am in sales you'll see a change then,( those basters) ,no more FREE BEES.
If any way I can help you just call,sometimes a old war horse like me knows a lot because of experence
Joseph J Bechta Sr.609-868-0956cell 856-262-3050 home NO PAY NEEDED