newjerseynewsroom.com

Wednesday
Feb 08th

Post-conviction bonds could solve N.J. prison overcrowding and save taxpayer money

prisonMF011410_opt_optBY DENNIS BARTLETT
COMMENTARY

New Jersey spends almost a billion dollars a year on its prison system. The state has about 26,000 inmates crammed into a system designed for around 17,000. It operates at 132 percent capacity. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in 2008, there were 12,984 new inmates cranked into the system while 13,885 were released. Of those put back on the streets, 9,068 were released subject to compliance with certain conditions.

Dry stuff for statisticians? Maybe. That is until you realize it costs the state $38,700 to house just a single inmate. How much did you pay in state taxes last year? How do you feel about paying for just part of one year's upkeep for a single convict?

New Jersey prisons are overcrowded. Is there a way to reduce the prison census and save almost $40 thousand tax dollars a year per inmate? Is there a way to do it consistent with public safety?

Fall Out

Prison overcrowding is the fruit of mandatory sentencing enacted years ago.

They did put them away. They did lock them up. They did reduce the crime problem on the streets. But this legacy has come back to bite the states in the budget. The end result has been prisons operating grossly over capacity, such as in California, where the state's 33 prisons were designed to hold 84,000 inmates but are packed with 158,000. States are being forced to release prisoners early and turn away new inmates, which is giving criminals the opportunity to become repeat offenders without much consequence. With current solutions proving largely ineffective, the commercial surety bail insurance industry is backing a relatively new answer that uses financial collateral as incentive for convicted criminals to be released: the conditional post-conviction release bond.

History of the conditional post-conviction release bond

Many people point to the late 1980s and '90s as the point where prison overcrowding began to accelerate faster than states could keep up. The commercial surety bail industry began working with the American Legislative Exchange Council on the Conditional Post-conviction Release Bond Act as another method of prison population reduction. Post-conviction bonds are based on the idea that after convictions, courts, probation department, or a designated release authority can select nonviolent offenders who meet strict criteria and allow them to post bond with private bail agencies. Benefits of post-conviction bonds include: (1) there being no cost to taxpayers, (2) that criminals have financial incentive to appear in court or for probation hearings, and (3) the final desired result that prison populations are reduced, leaving space for violent offenders to serve full sentences.

ALEC's model bill supports performance indicators wherein probation agencies monitor criminals for drug testing, maintenance of employment, recovery program involvement and other conditions. If they fail to comply, probation authorities inform the bonding agent to return the client to custody. If the bonding agent cannot recovery the principal, the agent pays a forfeiture.

Prison overcrowding spreading from coast to coast

California's struggle with its bloated prison system is representative of the plight of states across the country. In February 2009, a panel of three federal judges issued a tentative ruling that the state must quickly reduce its prison population by more than 57,000 inmates. California is examining measures such as limiting new admissions and giving prisoners shorter sentences for good behavior and rehabilitation efforts. California's "emergency release" program has created an environment where people no longer fear the consequences of committing crimes, not to mention the danger to public safety of releasing a massive cohort of convicts into a depressed economy.

According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, inmates let out on emergency release are the most likely to commit crimes. They know that if you commit certain crimes in California, they're just going to process you and walk you out the door two hours later. With so many criminals slipping away from the court system, many are calling for the increased accountability characteristic of post-conviction bonds. The post-conviction bond could even be used to keep people from entering the prison system at all. The judge would have the discretion to issue a sentence, decide whether the person is eligible for post-conviction bond and then send the defendant directly from the court room to a probation program. It's a win-win situation for the state because the prisons have one less inmate, and the state can collect money from the bail bondsman if the person skips and disappears.

Post-conviction bond not immune to controversy

Several groups, including prosecutors associations and district attorneys associations, have raised objections to post-conviction bonds. Their arguments vary, but many center on the idea that requiring convicted persons to post bond is unfair to indigents. Another source of resistance has been probation workers who believe post-conviction bonds might take away their job. Probation officers in Mississippi, where the statue was enacted almost three years ago, have widely accepted post-conviction bonds after realizing that help from the private sector would make their jobs easier by lessening their heavy workloads. Still others claim that post-conviction bonds are a self-serving measure by the bail industry because bail companies will profit financially. This concern is irrelevant. What is relevant is whether the mechanism works to reduce prison overcrowding.

The current state of the post-conviction bond

Three years have passed since Mississippi became the first state to adopt the Conditional Post-conviction Release Bond Act in 2007. Since then, Michigan passed a version of the bill in 2009. South Dakota passed it just last week. South Carolina introduced it last week. According to Gene Newman, Secretary of the Professional Bail Agents of the United States, North Carolina, Texas, California, and other states are in various stages of exploring similar initiatives.

Because the post-conviction bond program has only recently been implemented in Mississippi, there isn't a wealth of data available. But preliminary results are very promising. About 1,000 inmates have been released early from prison in Mississippi, and the rate of the criminals showing up to court has been about 97 percent. Financially, corrections departments would save around $24,000 to $40,000 per inmate for every year an inmate isn't in jail in jail, without factoring in medical costs and other expenses.

Post-conviction bonds could become the answer to help alleviate prison overcrowding crunch that America desperately needs.

Dennis Bartlett is the executive director of the American Bail Coalition

 
Comments (4)
4 Tuesday, 18 October 2011 21:23
jordan morgan
First off I AM NOT A VIOLENT PERSON. I do not break the law. I legally owned my pistol in the state of Delaware for work purposes. I was a vehicle recovery agent for s repossession company which is.am.extremely dangerous job. I purchased the weapon for self protection as I.have been shot at hit with bats and sticks had object thrown at my vehicle and everything else. I have two.children in new jersey whom I.came to.visit that weekend and.I.had no.safe place to leave my weapon and being I.was licensed to.carry I brought my weapon with me not knowing it was unlawful in the state of nj.without a new jersey specific permit. I wad cleaning my weapon when it went.off and I.was shot and injured. I now have a titanium rod and four bolts in my left femur for life. And I was.charged with unlawful possession of a weapon and sent to prison for a year and a month. Like.I.said it was an homestead mistake on my behalf for not knowing the law in nj when.it came to hand.guns. once again I am not a danger nor threat to society as the legal system portrayed me to.be.
Jordan Morgan IS a violent offender. He's just only been caught once, for making a stupid mistake. I know from experience. I wasted a lot of time trying to fix something that was broken from the start. He belongs where he is.
2 Saturday, 01 May 2010 12:07
Jeannie Kennedy
My cousin Jordan Morgan was sentenced 5-1 for unlawful possession of firearm. He had a licensed and registered hand gun. He needed it for work. He was a vehicle repo man. He worked in Delaware but often stayed at his second home in NJ on his off days. One night, while sleeping, he pulled his jacket over him to keep warm, the gun went off peirced through his hand then into his femur shattering the bone, which then required surgery. He was then charged with unlawful possession stating he had no registation in the state of NJ. Then the Investigators advised him that if this happened in his Mom's home, also in NJ, he would not have been charged. He then attained a defense attorney who coercively advised him to a plea deal. WHen he could not contact that defence attorney, he hired a private attorney. The private attorney also scared him into a [lea deal stsing if he doesn't take the deal, he will do 5 years. After signing the plea deal, he had second thoughts. He found out that his private attorney was a tax attorney from PA. He then hired another private attorney. This attorney Moved the court to Withdrawal the guilty plea stating he was illadvised and was not given all possibilities. The judge denied the withdrawal and he is now in jail for at least 1 year, max 5 years. I would like to find out more about this post sentence bonding. If we were to appeal, it would take 6 months, then he would still go through a trial. He was wrongfully advised to save the court trial expenses. This kid is not a violent offender. He should not be in jail. He had no priors. So he would be a perfect candidate for this post sentencing bond. Please reply with information on how I can apply for this bond. Thank You so much. Jeannie Kennedy
1 Saturday, 06 March 2010 10:39
none
NYT: States under fire as cuts free inmates
‘They’re letting out people they shouldn’t let out,’ Mich. prosecutor says
By Monica Davey
The New York Times
updated 4:42 a.m. ET, Fri., March. 5, 2010
In the rush to save money in grim budgetary times, states nationwide have trimmed their prison populations by expanding parole programs and early releases. But the result — more convicted felons on the streets, not behind bars — has unleashed a backlash, and state officials now find themselves trying to maneuver between saving money and maintaining the public’s sense of safety.

In February, lawmakers in Oregon temporarily suspended a program they had expanded last year to let prisoners, for good behavior, shorten their sentences (and to save $6 million) after an anticrime group aired radio advertisements portraying the outcomes in alarming tones. “A woman’s asleep in her own apartment,” a narrator said. “Suddenly, she’s attacked by a registered sex offender and convicted burglar.”

In Illinois, Gov. Patrick J. Quinn, a Democrat, described as “a big mistake” an early release program that sent some convicts who had committed violent crimes home from prison in a matter of weeks. Of more than 1,700 prisoners released over three months, more than 50 were soon accused of new violations.

An early release program in Colorado meant to save $19 million has scaled back its ambitions by $14 million after officials found far fewer prisoners than anticipated to be wise release risks. In more than five months, only 264 prisoners were released, though the program was designed to shrink the prison population by 2,600 over two years.

'Mistakes'
A victims’ rights group in California sued last month to block a state law that expands the credits prisoners can receive to shorten their sentences, and prosecutors in Michigan are challenging release decisions there.

“We’re not saying we shouldn’t reduce the prison population, but we’re saying you have to be very careful, and they’re making mistakes left, right and sideways,” said Jessica R. Cooper, the Oakland County prosecutor in Michigan, where the state prison population shrank by 3,200 inmates last year and where the parole rate is the highest in 16 years.

“You cannot measure those mistakes in terms of money,” Ms. Cooper said.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**