newjerseynewsroom.com

Tuesday
May 22nd

Could high autism rate in N.J. be linked to environment?

autismspeakslogo021210_optBY BOB HOLT
NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM

A new study from Stanford found that environmental factors may play a more important role in causing autism than genetics.

The study of 192 pairs of twins in California found that genetics accounted for about 38 percent of autism cases, while environment was responsible for about 62 percent. The results went against previous studies of twins, which showed genetics being accountable in 90 percent of the cases.

According to medpagetoday.com, the researchers said previous studies appear to have underestimated similar traits in fraternal twins compared with the current findings, which would overestimate the influence of genetics. They said these factors made genetic factors look more responsible than environmental as a potential cause of autism.

SFGate.com reports 54 pairs of twins were identical in the testing, while 138 were fraternal. At least one sibling in each pair was found to be autistic.

The researchers found that only about 60 to 70 percent of the identical twins both had autism diagnoses — less than expected — and 20 to 30 percent of fraternal twins had dual diagnoses — a lot higher than anticipated.

A study of 298 autistic children in Northern California system found the risk of autism increased two times when mothers took antidepressants at some point the year before giving birth. Researchers stressed that anti-depressants weren’t necessarily the cause of autism, and women taking such drugs should not stop. But they said the new studies needed to be considered due to new environmental findings.

CNN reports that approximately 1 in 110 children in the United States have some form of an autism spectrum disorder (ASD), according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ASDs become apparent by the time a child turns 3, and exact causes are not known, and there's no cure.

The group believes more research is needed into environmental risk factors, such as parental age, low birth weight, multiple births, and maternal infections during pregnancy.

New Jersey has the highest amount of autism cases nationwide, with one in 94. Ezinearticles.com reports that about 87,000 people are estimated to have some form of autism in New Jersey.

 
Comments (4)
4 Saturday, 24 March 2012 07:32
Saws09
Do you know how many millions of children have been vaccinated against MMR who have absolutely no indication of ASD? This is not a new vaccine. Do you know how high the levels of Mercury are in the NJ water? Do you know that NJ is one of the most polluted states in the nation with higher rates than the national average not only of ASD, but birth defects and cancer, too? NJ alone has over 220 super fund sites. The high use of chemicals in our environments is a relatively new phenomenon. My generation (grew up in '80s) is one of the firsts to have grown up with a higher rate of these pollutants. By the time we got pregnant we had a large accumulation of these chemicals in our bodies over decades of exposure. Fetuses are being exposed to higher levels in utero than EVER before, & this is the MOST important time in development, period. We are exposed to more chemicals from a new car or the back of a TV set or pesticides on our food than we ever get from a single vaccine or from the entire vaccine schedule, yet people continue to focus on vaccines. Furthermore, signs of autism are apparent as early as 6 mos to the cautious and trained observer, far before the first MMR vaccine is ever started. Parents, being untrained in this area, do not notice these subtle signs or brush them off. But when they see the more obvious signs later in the second year, they see a temporal association between ASD and vaccines and run with it. Then parents, again uneducated on the subject, opt out of life-saving vaccines leading to the outbreaks of once rare diseases that we're seeing across the nations. Vaccine rates are dropping in various groups...yet the rates of autism continue to rise. Explain that in the context of vaccine conspiracy theories. Past vaccines have had adverse effects on occasion, & they're addressed promptly. Example- the old rotavirus vaccine and intussusception. This vaccine was promptly removed and reformulated, & the scientific jury is still out as to whether it was just another temporal association or something more concrete. In the face of ALL this evidence, WHY do people continue to waste time and effort fighting vaccines, which have provided decades long and millions in sample sizes worth of observational data to the contrary? Why not take a more serious look at all of these chemicals in our environment from big business polluters that our capitalistic society is so afraid to go up against? 220+ super fund sites in 1 small state and higher than average rates of cancer, birth defects, AND autism then the rest of the nation...and you STILl want to blindly focus on vaccines? We're in a lot of trouble.
3 Thursday, 07 July 2011 05:42
popcares
Can someone please explain why vaccines are NEVER considered as the MAIN environmental factor-source contributing to exploding autism rates?

What is the environmental "impact" on a child .. INJECTED with numerous vaccines .. each vaccine containing numerous ingredients .. some of them containing known toxins .. such as .. mercury, aluminum and formaldehyde .. prior to five years of age?

Which begs the question........

Why does the United States, with the most heavily vaccinated children in the world .. rank far down the list of developed nations in "infant mortality" rates .. where 6.33 per 1000 children die before their reach 1 year of age?

The annual birth rate in the United States is somewhere between 4 and 5 million births a year .. which means .. tens of thousands of children die EVERY year prior to one year of age .. even though the vast majority of these children are vaccinated .. ostensibly to "protect" them from numerous communicable diseases that other nations .. with better "infant mortality" rates .. do NOT vaccinate for.

Why doesn't anyone ask why the "infant mortality" rate in the United States does not improve each time a new vaccine is added to the already crowded schedule .. and .. question why we appear .. instead .. to trend even further down the list of developed nations?
2 Wednesday, 06 July 2011 22:58
Maurine Meleck
the environment trumps genetics. Two decades late, but better than never. Now they need to take one more giant step from anything but vaccines to vaccines as cuase.
1 Wednesday, 06 July 2011 11:15
Anne McElroy Dachel
Autism is now an epidemic in the U.S., affecting one percent of children and almost 2 percent of boys. In the 1970s, the rate was one in 10,000 kids and most people never heard of the disorder. The national rate of one in 110 kids is based on studies of eight year olds, not eighty year olds. No one has ever found a comparable rate of autism among adults, especially adults with classic autism where the symptoms are undeniable.

The truth is, there's never been a genetic epidemic in human history. For two decade health officials told us that all the autism everywhere was the result of "better diagnosing" and that faulty genes caused it. Millions of dollars have gone into fruitless genetic research. Most egregious has been the failure of experts to look into the thousands of reports from parents who said that their child was born healthy and was developing normally until they were vaccinated. Suddenly they changed, lost speech, stopped making eye contact, lost learned skills and regressed into autism.

Despite the fact that the environmental link is finally recognized, will we be forced to endure another 20 years of official pharma-funded studies showing that the trigger isn't vaccines?

Anne Dachel, Media editor: Age of Autism

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**