newjerseynewsroom.com

Saturday
Feb 04th

Medical malpractice debated while doctor shortage continues in N.J.

stethoscope061410_optWith New Jersey facing a worsening shortage of physicians, key medical and business groups say it's time for the Legislature and Gov. Christie's to take action on medical malpractice reform.

Proponents of reform, such as the New Jersey Lawsuit Reform Alliance and the New Jersey Hospital Association, are stepping up their lobbying, according to an article at NJSpotlight.com. They blame the current laws with for skyrocketing malpractice insurance premiums, forcing doctors out of the state. And they claim that New Jersey's largest employer, pharmaceutical companies, are plagued because they are often named in malpractice lawsuits filed in the state.

But the state' trial lawyer association claims that there's no need for reform, and that the number of medical malpractice suits has dropped 45 percent in the last 14 years.

The problem, the attorneys argue, is medical malpractice, and the medical community must take steps to prevent errors by doctors, nurses and hospitals.

— NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM

 
Comments (4)
4 Sunday, 15 August 2010 20:12
Jeremy Engdahl-Johnson
What pressures face new companies in medical professional liability insurance? More on this, other medmal questions at http://www.healthcaretownhall.com/?p=2661
3 Friday, 13 August 2010 09:49
James O'Hare RPLU AIC AIS
There are many reasons for reform and alot of money involved so I understand the emotion. If you want reform,-THIS is what will work.

- get more of the indemnity to the injured . They only get 40% of the cases total cost. 60% go to fees. Sliding fees for attorneys.

- mandatory insurance for docs, you need it to drive! No policy / no patients.

- Cap on pain and suffering awards, you pick the amount. You cant measure nor weigh pain by $'s. A subjective concept with an objective fix ($) .

- Loser of the case pays the costs of the other party. Many ideas exist here.

- Structured settlements for all settlements over $500k- it helps everyone.

- Presuit affidavits from experts re liability, causation and damages. mandatory mediations.

- Arbitration - a jury of peers. Still your day in court, just a different forum.

- In court, a jury of peers , docs intentionally don't get them, how about a minimum of a bachelor degree to sit for med mal. Would you want your career decided by a few people that have seen House and ER a few times ?

I could go on and on. The truth is nobody really wants to fix this, too much money involved. Most of the thousand cases that I have settled since 1985 have some element of fatigue, poor communication, especially at shift changes, and /or poor staffing. Pay the money to nurses and get more of them and the number of claims will decrease.

One last thing med mal has nothing to do with the cost of Healthcare. Repeal McCarron ferguson . Give me access to all 1500 healthcare carriers in the US. Let them compete for my buck.

Lets see- you pay a large premium, you have a large deductible to meet before they pay and then a co-pay. So what do they get to pay? Sweet deal.
regards Jim O'Hare VP claims PIC pompano fl
2 Friday, 13 August 2010 08:59
Michael End
Why do you call restricting the rights of injured patients "reform"? The principle of tort law has always been that a person injured by the negligence of another should be compensated for his or her injuries. Because doctors are committing a lot of malpractice does not mean that people injured by doctors' negligence ought to have their right to be compensated restricted. That is not "reform".
It might surprise you to know that New Jersey has the 7th highest number of doctors in patient care per capita of the 50 states. The national average is 25.3 doctors in patient care per 10,000 people. New Jersey has 30.1. New Jersey is way ahead of the curve in that respect.
1 Friday, 13 August 2010 07:45
Common Sense
"But the state' trial lawyer association claims that there's no need for reform..."
Duh
Talk about the roosters guarding the hen house.

How's this for tort reform; cap attorney fees at $250,000 - why should they get 30% of big awards when they weren't the harmed parties?

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**