newjerseynewsroom.com

Wednesday
May 23rd

Cell phone in Charlie Chaplin movie explained (VIDEO)

chaplin102910_optBY BOB HOLT
NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM

Time travelers? Cell phones in 1928? Or simply a great marketing hoax for a Charlie Chaplin movie? Chaplin may have been further ahead of his time than we thought.

The story first surfaced in a YouTube video that includes film footage showing the 1928 premiere of the Charlie Chaplin film "The Circus" at Manns Chinese Theatre in Hollywood, Calif. Irish filmmaker George Clarke points out a woman in the old footage holding what he describes as a cell phone against her ear. The shape implies the woman is a time traveler using a modern mobile device rather than an ear trumpet, Clarke said.

19th-century resonator hearing aids such as ear trumpets were still made in large numbers well into the first decades of the 20th century, Philip Skroska, an archivist at the Bernard Becker Medical Library of Washington University in St. Louis explained to the Christian Science Monitor, and the basic designs didn't change much aside from incorporating newer, plastic-like materials.

"Besides, I would expect this woman to be over 50 years old, so using a late 19th century design in 1928 would not be a stretch I think," Skroska said.

Electronic hearing aids also existed before World War II, but in fewer numbers.

"Now, I can't really explain why the woman appears to be talking (other than yelling at the man who quickened his pace ahead of her)," Skroska said in an e-mail.

According to Clarke, the footage of the walking, apparently talking woman was found in the special-features section on a DVD release of Chaplin's The Circus. E Online reports one YouTuber suggested the shot could be the result of a post-production worker having some fun.

Time travel expert, physicist Dr. Michio Kaku discussed the possibility of time travel with Time magazine, saying, "There is a loophole in Einstein's equation that even Einstein realized was there. In Einstein's equation, time is a river. It speeds up, meanders, and slows down. The new wrinkle, is that it can have whirlpools and fork into two rivers. So, if the river of time can be bent into a pretzel, create whirlpools and fork into two rivers, then time travel cannot be ruled out."

Clarke claims the footage has not been tampered with in any way and seems convinced this is evidence of time travel.

Telegraph.co.uk says other explanations range from the woman holding a block of ice to take away the pain of a dental appointment, to the clip itself being a fake — detractors point out that fade transitions had not been developed in the 1920s.

No word back yet from Warner Home Video as to whether the footage, as presented in the YouTube clip, appears undoctored.

We don't have the answers. But in a related story, it's the 25th anniversary of "Back to the Future" this week.

 
Comments (18)
18 Sunday, 07 November 2010 04:46
KaReeN
no one can believe that !! Sorry this is just a big jock ..
dwd
17 Monday, 01 November 2010 16:17
mona s
you said obviously its not a fm radio because its 1928, well if there werent any satellites for radios then there obviously werent any for cellphones.
16 Sunday, 31 October 2010 08:13
mandy2211
The lady could have been holding anything and talking to herself. I talk to myself all the time. :)
15 Saturday, 30 October 2010 12:06
Ol Bob
She was fumbling in her collar for a broken earring when a fart cut by the fast-walking old goat preceding her broke under her nose; naturally she blamed the zebra and paused to kick it in the ass with those gunboats she was wearing on her dainty feet. She reconsidered due to her disadvantageous position(fearing a return stroke), cursed, and walked on.
14 Saturday, 30 October 2010 11:57
Ol Bob
If voice recorders were invented in 1857, why wasn't Lincoln's Gettysburg Address recorded?
13 Saturday, 30 October 2010 07:19
Nikmac
Why is everyone assuming that the mobile phone, if that's what is, would need a cell tower or 3G etc etc? If it is indeed a time traveller, then there is every possibility that they could come from a point in time beyond our own future.
this u can see clearly by the movement of her fingers when she stops which clearly shows that she was holding a cloured cloth or a handkerchief and not a cell [phone or device.
ladies used to carry a hand kerchief in the older days whenever they go out in their hands and even she is doing the same and was talking to her husband ahead.
11 Friday, 29 October 2010 23:29
Fabs
Who would he be talking to on a cellphone so casually if he was time travelling?

Plus, two objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time, including a time travelling person and the air in the space that he appears. Also, the earth is constantly moving very very fast, by the time time travel would be invented, we will be light years away from where the earth was in the 1920s, to travel back to earth by hundreds of years would also require a way of moving light years from your current position.

He is also a person in the film, not just a stranger, which means that whatever he was holding has been passed around by other people from that time, so why did people not hear about this back then?

It's not a time traveller, I think he's talking with someone around him, and holding some padding on his ear, cause it's cold?
10 Friday, 29 October 2010 21:53
Dave Lister
If she is really using a cell phone, then Forrest Gump in real life did tell John F. Kennedy he had to pee.
9 Friday, 29 October 2010 21:28
vinny
She's talking to her agent and looking at the camera. No wonder she's an extra.
8 Friday, 29 October 2010 19:54
Matt Long
... and asking what this device is -if- it is someone walking down the street using a cell phone? I know I would have been the first to quickly investigate if I saw someone holding a non-1928 device upto one's ear and appearing to talk into it ... and what about the camera man who she/he looks at toward the end? (assuming the camera is manned)
7 Friday, 29 October 2010 19:30
iAngelDJ
no cellphone towers for that time, satelites? how that shit works?
6 Friday, 29 October 2010 18:56
TheGreatWhiteHorse
Why would a time traveler be on a cellphone if they traveled back to the 1920s? Who the hell would she be calling? There are no wireless or satellite or 3G networks set up back then...would she make a collect call to 2018? Can the wormhole she used to get to the 1920s send her cell phone signal 80 years through time?

If it was a hard-wired phone, I might see the sense of sending a voicemail forwars through time (a la 12 Monkeys) but a cellphone wouldn't even work.

Besides...would a time traveller be walking down the crowded street talking on a futuristic cell phone anyway? Wouldn't that cause a bit of a stir? Why wouldn't the guy in front of her stop and wonder what she was up to?

Come on, everybody. This is nuts. A cell phone wouldnt WORK in the 1920s.
5 Friday, 29 October 2010 18:15
Kev465
I say it's hard to tell if she's holding anything at all. I think she's shading her face from the sun.
4 Friday, 29 October 2010 17:47
L Craig
In 1857 they had ways to record but not in a portable fashion as this device appears to be.
3 Friday, 29 October 2010 15:38
Patti Starri
those were HUGE.....right?
I go for time traveler.
What do lip readers say she says?
It is a woman, women had really big
well worked hands back then. Not 2010
sissy hands.
2 Friday, 29 October 2010 15:31
Wilson Hines
Your article gave no scientific or historic reason for the film anomaly. You should have entitled the article "A cell phone in a Charlie Chaplin movie?" or something along those lines, because you never explained anything. You have no better reasons for the anomaly than the comments under the video.
1 Friday, 29 October 2010 15:29
bob smith
the lady could have been talking into a voice recorder because they were invented in 1857.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**