I find it highly unlikely that the President would take a young girl's virginity especially under the circumstances she describes. Only four days on the job, and the President ,by sheer insight, pegs her correctly: "she is that type of girl". He was going to take an incredible risk that she would not run out screaming and traumatized. He of course cleaned up the messy sheets after taking her virginity,i suppose .In the early 1960's ,a girl with no experience ,of her pedigree taking Dave Powers in her mouth is preposterous.

What a relief, John Kennedy was sexually unfaithful to his wife so we can stop waiting for our Roman Catholic-controlled Congress to take action about the Roman Catholic, Knight of Malta-led CIA's colonel E. Howard Hunt's legally probative deathbed confession (already settled law by a jury's judgment in 'Hunt v. Marchetti') to having assassinated our president, led by George H.W. Bush and Richard Nixon, on behalf of the Vatican banker Rockefellers to send 58,000 of us to die shedding the blood of millions of innocent Asians on behalf of the Vietnamese "branch" of the Roman Anti-Christ of which Our Founder, Thomas Jefferson, warned.

As the same papist Fifth Column recently committed 9/11, curiously and satanically abetted by a fully emerged "goy hating" Jewish Fifth Column wishing to turn us into their "golem" to kill and die shedding the blood of innocent Iranians, should knowing George W. Bush's wife might not have been concerned about the homosexual prostitute he "entertained" hundreds of times in the White House, James Guckert/"Jeff Gannon," make any difference as to his treason?

Who is worthy of the name "American?" Slaves certainly are not.

Death for Treason

There are psychological concomitants contributing to sexual behaviors such as those of John F. Kennedy (Mimi and her new book). It is a myriad, not the sex drive, but compensatory behavior, relationship with the mother, self-indulgence in youth, certain family displacement behavior, and other factors -- some might add selfishness.

If we put up with a guy who is interesting and fun, we wind up with someone who is interesting and fun, and life will be good. If we insist on electing nothings, we'll end up with freaks and zeroes.....I'm an engineer and know, the only perfect number...is...ZERO......Oh my God, look at Washington and Franklin...

Coleridge championed the formula for getting readers to "suspend disbelief". The formula was not complex. Mix one part human interest, one part anything that might be - or could be true - with many parts "fantastic and non-realistic elements" and rely heavily on the ignorance (or sheer laziness) of the press and public.

Mimi Alford and Random House have pulled off the formula to perfection. I mean, they could not have spread the affliction quicker if it had been a rogue escaped virus from a CIA lab.

Barbara Gamarekian started it all by mentioning Mimi during her oral history interview.

BUT - BUT -

1. BG never referred to her as an intern.

2. BJ never claimed any personal knowledge of the kind of relationship that existed between JFK and Mimi. She explicitly states in fact that, "I don't know what the relationship was... most of these stories were told to me all second hand...

Yet here is how Robert Dallek wrote it up after obtaining permission from Gamarekian to access those parts of her interview dealing with Mimi:

Kennedy's womanizing had, of course, always been a form of amusement, but it also now gave him a release from unprecedented daily tensions. Kennedy had affairs with several women including Pamela Turnure, Jackie's press secretary; Mary Pinchot Meyer, Ben Bradlee's sister-in-law; two White House secretaries playfully dubbed Fiddle and Faddle; Judith Campbell Exner, whose connections to mob figures like Sam Giancana made her the object of FBI scrutiny; and a "tall, slender, beautiful" college sophomore and White House Intern, who worked in the press office during two summers (she "had no skills" a member of the press staff recalled. "She couldn't type.")

How many errors of fact can one historian make in one paragraph?

In order...

Exner's story has been discredited.

The "two White House secretaries" were NOT playfully dubbed Fiddle and Faddle by Kennedy as Dallek seems to imply. They too, gave an interview for the Kennedy library (on March 16, 1965). Priscilla Wear had the nickname "Fiddle" prior to starting at the White House. Jill Cowan was given the knick name "Faddle" by other staff due to her closeness to "Fiddle".

Nowhere does BG describe Mimi as "tall, slender, beautiful" in fact, at one point, she refers to her as "the little girl who had been left back in the United States"... when all those non-attractive, non-victims of Kennedy went to Ireland with him.

Nowhere does BG describe Mimi as an "intern" and as I discuss in my blog, BG was so upset by this error, she wrote to the New York Times to complain because she felt Dallek was drawing on the publicity surrounding Monica Lewinski.

"She had no skills. She couldn't type" is indeed a direct quote from the Oral History. But it's taken out of context. She was the editor of her school paper - so she had some background for work in a press office. And it did not matter if she couldn't type. There was nothing to type on. BG, does go on to say that she was a bright girl who could answer phones and messages and later suggests that was what was needed because the phones "were insane".

Clearly Dallek has gone beyond his evidence in claiming it as fact that Mimi had an affair with JFK. It was all based on his reading between the lines of someone hinting at what she had heard by way of rumor. And when Mimi was tracked down, she went along with it - she says now because they had found out her secret.

But of course, they hadn't. They were chasing rumors and speculation.

The only evidence is Mimi's own word.