For San Francisco 49ers, N.Y. Giants game is not the most important contest of the year | Professional | -- Your State. Your News.

Jul 02nd
  • Login
  • Create an account
  • Search
  • Local Business Deals

For San Francisco 49ers, N.Y. Giants game is not the most important contest of the year

49ers012112_optBY EVAN WEINER

There is an awful lot of hype that is surrounding this Sunday's National Football Conference championship game between the East Rutherford, New Jersey-based New York Giants and the soon to be Santa Clara 49ers. Although, the franchise will more than likely keep the San Francisco 49ers brand name when the team is relocated down the 101 to the southern part of the San Francisco Bay.

The championship contest according to the radio barkers, the television talking heads and the sports scribes is the most important game that both teams will play this year and there will be other hyperbole as game time gets closer.

But for the 49ers ownership led by former Wall Street employee Jed York, the truth is that the Giants-49ers matchup is not the most important game of the year or maybe the 21st century. Jed and his parents all of a sudden may have seen the planned Santa Clara football facility and the hope of getting the 49ers franchise into a cash cow stadium that would be underwritten by Santa Clara municipal funding tripped up at the three yard line by a defender that may have caught them by surprise.

Santa Clara Plays Fair.

Things were going very well for the Yorks. Santa Clara residents went to the polls in June 2010 and approved Measure J which allowed Santa Clara to contribute funding to the football stadium which would be built to house the 49ers and possibly the Oakland Raiders. Santa Clara would throw in $79 million and another $35 million would come from a "hotel investment" but the Yorks and the National Football League (with a $150 million loan) would be responsible for the rest of the money in the estimated cost of building the $923 million facility.

The Yorks though were sort of told in 2010 by the NFL not to find stadium money with a March 1, 2011 lockout looming because the owners were crying poverty and if the Yorks found stadium money while the owners were asking players to throw in a few million or so, it would undercut the owners argument that they had financial difficulties.

The Yorks didn't seek financing during the lockout. The city eventually revised the deal with the Yorks and removed the Yorks' financial risk and decided to take on the responsibility of financing the building. Santa Clara was on the hook for $850 million instead of the original $79 million which voters approved in June 2010.

The stadium plan seemed to go hand-in-hand with the 49ers season. The money was guaranteed by Santa Clara and the franchise was winning. But something went awry on Wednesday.

Comments (1)
1 Sunday, 22 January 2012 00:00
Larry Rinzel
Santa Clara has approximately 116,000 people (Wikipedia quoting US 2010 Census) of which approximately 25,000 are under 18. If these numbers are correct, and if the 91,000 adults pay for their "fair share" of the $850,000,000.00 loan, they will essentially be paying $9340.00 each (not including loan servicing fees).

I hope at the very least, every person in Santa Clara gets free lifetime tickets to all games played at the new stadium. I suspect, given the hidden agenda by the 49er's and the Santa Clara City Council, the Santa Clara residents will be charged just like anyone else for their tickets. I'm glad I don't live in Santa Clara because I can do a lot with $9K and it doesn't include $9K worth of football tickets.

Can't the City Council do simple math? Who are these people, (including the city attorney, "a deal is a deal")?

I certainly wouldn't trust any part of my life to these people. They are just lost, or being paid very, very well.

Add your comment

Your name:

Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509