newjerseynewsroom.com

Friday
Mar 12th

U.S. is no longer the leader in solar power

thumb_vilalbasolar_optNew Jersey, California doing their part, but other states are dragging their feet

BY JOE TYRRELL
NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM
SECOND IN A SERIES

As the United States casts around for clean, domestic sources of energy, New Jersey has become a national leader in solar power, surpassing states with far greater land area and more days of sunshine.

But being a leader in solar energy in America is a little like being the fastest Model T Ford or the best sounding gramophone: the world has moved on.

While far behind California, New Jersey ranks second among the states in the number of solar power sources connected to the power grid. The small state has more than 4,000 solar sources connected to the power grid, currently generating about 85 megawatts, or about 9 percent of the nation's total.

That success reflected state policies, primarily a rebate program that helped homeowners and businesses to go solar, often in the familiar rooftop arrays of power cells.

The state Board of Public Utilities has moved away from that approach, though, trying to create "a market-driven industry," said spokesman Doyal Siddell. The board established solar renewable energy credits, or SRECs, representing solar generating capacity. The idea is that investors will purchase them, helping producers expand, and profit when utilities buy more solar power.

New Jersey was one of a handful of states that launched successful solar power programs at a time when the federal government lacked a national renewable strategy, other than turning corn to ethanol.

About half the states have joined New Jersey in requiring utilities to add renewable energy to their portfolios. But in the United States, that is often defined as biofuels like ethanol, of dubious net benefit, plus wood, landfill gas and garbage.

As a result, the United States no longer is the leader in solar power.

"No, we're not, and it was kind of a missed opportunity," said Monique Hanis, communications director for the Solar Energy Industries Association in Washington, D.C. "We developed most of this technology and now it's being used in other countries."

In May, the Legislature of sun-broiled Texas again blocked bills to provide solar power incentives and add renewable energy to utility portfolios. Meanwhile, General Motors announced plans to build the world's biggest solar rooftop power station – two million square feet of panels – at its plant in Zaragoza, Spain.

At the same, legislators in the Sunshine State of Florida also refused to establish requirements for utilities to add renewable energy sources to their supplies.

Conversely, in the beginning of July, photovoltaics developer Opel International of Shelton, Ct., announced completion of the first phase of an innovative 440 kW solar system.

The new installation, which uses a tracking system to focus sunlight onto high efficiency solar cells, is already providing power to the grid and is scheduled for completion this fall. It is also being built in Spain, in partnership with Betasol.

Opel already has demonstrated smaller versions in Canada and South Korea and elsewhere, according to Frank Middleton, the company's vice president of marketing. While not large in terms of power plants, the technology has attracted wide interest in Europe and North Africa, he said.

"Once people heard about the new installation, we've had numerous contacts and visits," Middleton said.

The remaining sections should be finished by autumn, and the first section is already hooked into the grid, he said. But Opel does not have the only innovative solar plant going up in Spain.

Outside Seville, 600 rotating mirrors direct light to a 380-foot tower whose heat drives a steam turbine with a peak capacity of 11 megawatts of electricity. The "power tower" is one of nine planned by Abengoa Solar. Within four years, the network is expected to provide enough electricity for 153,000 homes.

Middleton touts technology advances, but he gives much of the credit to the Spanish government. Like many countries in Europe and Asia, Spain imposes "feed-in tariffs," which require utilities to buy specified amounts of power from clean energy producers at above-market rates.

The tariffs have turned solar power in Germany and wind power in Denmark into major sources of electricity. Spain started slower, but also has turned solar into a major contributor to its electricity stream, although its future is uncertain because of the scheduled sunset of the tariffs.

All three countries, and others around the world, launched the programs to address the issues underlying the search for clean energy: pollution from conventional fuels and rising global temperatures.

Although tariff particulars vary among countries, "I think it has resulted in a better system of incentives" than other approaches, Middleton said.

Solar power advocates acknowledge that in most of the world, their industry needs some form of support to be competitive with fossil fuels or nuclear power.

"From a purely cost perspective, any form of renewable energy is going to be two to five times as conventional energy sources," said John Crider, a strategic planning engineer for Gainesville Regional Utilities.

In March, the Florida city became the first American jurisdiction to establish a feed-in tariff to support alternative energy. The city has an unusual history of activism on climate issues, having ratified the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which committed nations to reducing their emission of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, which contribute to global warming.

Despite the costs, Gainesville officials felt clean energy systems "would promote economic development in the community" Crider said. The city is in the unusual situation of having its own utility – the outcome of a century-old dispute over an $8 bill – and can consider the social benefits of its programs, he said.

Rebates, tax breaks, credits and other programs all have shortcomings, Crider said. Either the flow of money "can be interrupted by the budget cycle," or it pays for equipment and administration, not necessarily power production, he said.

 



Last Updated ( Friday, 17 July 2009 12:46 )  
Comments (4)
4 Friday, 07 August 2009 14:19
u.
when will we wake up ,-unsafe storage of the waste concerns as all-
this is the sunshine state -the usa is slipping far behind other countries in many ways solar energy one more on the agenda
3 Monday, 27 July 2009 15:52
ECD Fan
FreeCleanSolar.com's claim that PV solar is somehow cheaper than utility electricity is ridiculous. The commenter conveniently forgot to note that PV generates zero electricity at night, while the utility is happy to provides it at a nice, low rate per kWh. Not only is cost per kW cheaper for traditional utility, cost per kWh is even cheaper (as coal plants can operate 24 hours, while PV can do 3-4 hours a day, at best, at peak capacity)

And to Mr. Saporito: If modern technology were so great, why do you need State involvement? Or are you simply trying to scam the taxpayers out of their hard earned money?
2 Saturday, 18 July 2009 14:25
FreeCleanSolar.com
The U.S. does need to get mobilized and tackle the energy issue. The fact is that solar power costs less than energy from a traditional utility. Solar costs have never been lower, and government incentives have never been better. The bottom line is that many homeowners and business owners can afford solar power today.

Take your monthly electric bill and multiply by 12 months, then again by 25 years to determine how much you will spend on electricity during the typical life of a solar panel system. Then depending on your energy needs, compare this to the $5,000 to $25,000 cost to install solar panels.

For example, if you spend $200 per month for electricity, then you will spend $81,979 over 25 years, including a low annual price inflation rate of 2.5%. No matter how you calculate it, you will save money with a solar panel system. Some so-called experts will say the cost per kilo-watt (kW) for traditional utility energy is less than the cost per kW of solar. Remember, you can pay the utility for 25 years, with annual price increases, or you can pay 80% less with solar power.

If you are worried about the upfront cost for solar panels, there are many financing and leasing programs available if you are a homeowner with good credit. Some loans are tax-deductible too.

Do something about this today, then visit a site like FreeCleanSolar.com to search a nationwide network of 500 local solar installers. You can also find information about state solar rebates, federal tax credits, solar financing and leasing, system costs and the benefits of going solar. The bottom line is that many homeowners and business owners can afford solar power today.
1 Saturday, 18 July 2009 05:48
Saporito Energy Consultants, Inc.
The State of Florida remains out of touch with modern technology in solar development and utilization. The Florida legislature needs to wake up and require public utilities like the Florida Power and Light Company to assist residential and commercial customers with financing and installation of packaged grid-tied solar energy systems. There appears to be something very wrong in this state where such programs are lacking?

Thomas Saporito
President
http://saporitoenergyconsultants.com

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Facebook Group: /#/pages/Montclair-NJ/New-Jersey-Newsroom/74298523155?ref=ts Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509 Contact NJNR: contacts

Hot topics

 

2010 NFL Draft: Inside the New Jersey prospects

 

Please take the New Jersey Newsroom 20-second survey

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

Ways to donate to Haiti Earthquake relief