Wind turbine proposal for N.J. gets a push: 'No significant environmental impact' | Science updates | -- Your State. Your News.

Jul 02nd
  • Login
  • Create an account
  • Search
  • Local Business Deals

Wind turbine proposal for N.J. gets a push: 'No significant environmental impact'

windfarmFL061011BY JOE TYRRELL

U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced a major step toward the development of wind turbine fields off the coasts of New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland and Virginia.

At a news conference in Baltimore with Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, Salazar said federal environmental reviews of four designated "wind energy areas" off the coast have found "no significant environmental impact" from the construction and operation of turbines. The general finding does not confer approval for any specific project, but the department expects to move ahead with lease sales this year.

The areas, designated last year by the departments of energy and the interior, are located off AtlanticCity, N.J., Rehoboth Beach, Del., Ocean City, Md., and Virginia Beach, Va. Calling their potential wind energy "staggering, Salazar said, "No developer should have to wait nine or 10 years to get a lease."

Interior is streamlining its process for renewable energy leases, he said. The department now describes its mission as "protecting our great outdoors and powering our future."

The decision offers immediate hope for a demonstration project in state waters off Cape May, which developers hope to expand to federal waters on the outer continental shelf. The new ruling opens up portions of the OCS for exactly that sort of commercial expansion.

Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) called the decision "a win for the economy, a win for the environment and a win for New Jersey." The state will be able to develop "homegrown clean energy jobs," he said. "Instead of risking oil spills and public health, it will create jobs, clean up our air and move America to a clean energy future."

"Harnessing the wind blowing off our shores will allow us to power American homes with clean, domestic energy – and create tens of thousands of badly-needed jobs in the process," said Kit Kennedy of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

"Tapping into the power of offshore wind off of New Jersey is vital to getting our state and the nation off fossil fuels without creating more pollution," added Matt Elliott of Environment New Jersey. He pointed to a showing the Department of Energy's "conservative goal of developing 54 gigawatts of offshore wind power would be the pollution reduction equivalent of taking 18 million cars off the road.

That assumes no further increases in fossil fuel burning, blamed for the rise in greenhouse gasses linked to global warming. But Salazar firmly placed wind power in the Obama Administration's "all of the above" energy strategy, which includes additional fossil fuel development.

Pressured by congressional Republicans, the administration recently rejected a route for a new pipeline to transport dirtier Canadian tar sands oil through the center of the country to the Gulf of Mexico, a project opposed by environmentalists and the state of Nebraska. But the administration left the door open for approving a revised route after the November election.

Offshore wind is not without its own controversies, with some environmentalists questioning the effects of turbine fields on migratory birds and marine life. Other skeptics point to the current high cost of offshore wind power development compared to established technologies.

Joe Tyrrell may be reached at jtyrrell@newjerseynewsroom or followed on Twitter @ jtyrrell87.

Comments (1)
1 Thursday, 02 February 2012 15:56
Bill Heller
INDUSTRIAL WIND TURBINES DO NOT PROVIDE RENEWABLE ENERGY! Not one coal or gas plant the world over has been decommissioned because of IWTs...and eliminating our dependence on fossil fuels is their raison d’etre. To quote an expert: “Because wind blows intermittently, electric utilities must either keep their conventional power plants running all the time to make sure the lights don’t go dark, or continually ramp up and down the output from conventional coal-or gas-fired generators (called “cycling”). But coal-fired and gas-fired generators are designed to run continuously, and if they don’t, fuel consumption and emissions generally increase.” This is happening worldwide, and in places like Colorado and Texas where CO2 and power plant pollution have increased since installing wind farms:
The wind industry is built on crony capitalism, it is the only way it can exist. Taxpayer money builds them and power companies are mandated to buy wind generated power at much higher rates than conventionally produced power. There is no true benefit, except to wind power companies, politicians and lobbyists. Plus, the offshore wind farms will turin into an environmental disaster when the turbines break down eventually and there's no money or responsible companies left to remove them.

Add your comment

Your name:

Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509