newjerseynewsroom.com

Thursday
May 24th

Christie going after N.J. teachers’ benefits to motivate retirement

schundlerbret030410_optWill propose an Aug. 1 deadline for changes to go into effect

BY TOM HESTER SR.
NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM
THIRD UPDATE

In an effort to reduce the cost of pubic school education, Gov. Chris Christie is preparing to ask the Democratic-controlled Legislature to quickly approve a package of bills before it recesses on June 30, including a proposal that would make New Jersey‘s 178,858 teachers pick up part of the cost of their health benefits.

State Education Commissioner Bret Schundler revealed the initial details of the package Tuesday in an appearance before the Senate Budget Committee in Trenton. He said the governor will propose that the changes would become effective Aug. 1, prior to the start of the 2010-11 school year.

"The governor will propose health benefits' cost sharing beyond 1.5 percent,'' Schundler said. "He will propose a percentage on premiums above a certain threshold. He will also propose that the changes go into effect on August 1. For somebody (senior and higher paid teachers) who does not want to contribute to health care costs, they can retire before August 1 and get their full benefits. This way, a school district will have the opportunity to hire new employees who are less expensive. It will help immediately in fiscal year 11 (2010-11).''

As Democrats criticize Christie's plan to cut $819 million in state aid to schools, an average aid reduction of 7.4 percent, the governor has been attacking unionized teachers for not immediately agreeing to accept wage freezes to help school districts cover the lost aid. So far, teachers in 11 districts and superintendents in 100 districts have agreed to wage freezes. Democratic legislative leaders have not joined in the attack on the politically-powerful New Jersey Education Association.

The proposal is expected to include the constitutional amendment Christie wants voters to approve on the Nov. 2 ballot that would place a 2.5 percent annual cap on labor costs and property tax hikes.

Schundler also said Christie will call for collective bargaining reform, arguing the current arbitration system is unfair to districts and taxpayers and leads to approval of annual pay hikes of 4.5 percent for teachers. "Nobody in the private sector is getting that kind of money,'' Schundler said.

Christie is also expected to propose giving county school superintendents the power to disapprove a proposed contract settlement if it would increase salaries and benefits beyond a constitutional cap, fail to include cost sharing for health benefits, fail to mandate that teachers spend at least five hours daily with students, fail to specify a minimum number of work days for staff or bar the contracting of auxillary services. And the governor will propose that county superintendents implement the sharing of school business functions among districts in an effort to cut the cost of district management and contracts.

Schundler said teacher contracts are in negotiation in 267, or 40 percent, of school districts and if the Legislature approves Christie's proposals, the changes would help districts save money in the 2010-11 school year.

"Governor Christie will be advancing proposals that will work to moderate the pace at which school district salary and benefit costs are rising throughout New Jersey,'' Schundler said. "In addition, he will be proposing a constitutional cap on the pace at which spending for direct state services can rise, thereby dramatically increasing the amount of state funding that will be kept available for the education of our children in the years ahead.''

Derek Roseman, a spokesman for the Senate Democrats, said Democratic leaders want to see the final proposals before commenting.

Schundler said that while Christie cut $418 million for "non-school purposes,'' he increased aid for classrooms by $238 million. "That's a 2.4 percent increase in state funding for school districts amidst the greatest economic downturn since the Great Depression.‘'

Commenting on Schundler's appearance before the panel, NJEA President Barbara Keshishian said, "Despite today's Monmouth University poll showing the public does not blame teachers for the governor's impending school budget cuts, Commissioner Schundler's testimony ... was simply more of the same blame game."

She said, "While it may be technically correct to say that Governot Christie is proposing a $238 million increase in state education spending, Commissioner Schundler conveniently omits the fact that this ‘increase' is only the difference between last year's one-time federal stimulus money and the $819 million that the governor cut from state school aid. But the fact is that under Governor Christie, public school funding has been cut by $475 million this year, and will be cut by another $819 million next year.

"When Commissioner Schundler claims that school district salaries are rising three times faster than the rate of inflation, that's an outright falsehood," Keshishian said. "Over the past five years, the average rate of inflation was 2.76 percent. Over the past five years, the average teacher salary increased by 2.86 percent. Commissioner Schundler is misleading the public on this issue.'' She added, "It's time for the Christie administration to stop misleading the public, and trying to place all the blame for the state's fiscal woes on the public schools. That's irresponsible, and NJEA and its members will set the record straight every time this administration tries to bend it."

Schundler also said that the average local school property tax can be expected to rise 3 percent to 4 percent but maintained, "That's a much smaller year-to year increase than has been typical in the past 10 years, but remember: a lot of homeowners have lost their jobs, and even many of those who haven't are still suffering from reduced incomes.'‘

Neither Christie's nor the NJEA had any immediate comment on Schundler's comments about the governor's developing legislation.

 
Comments (12)
12 Monday, 14 November 2011 17:14
recent high school graduate
since when did school stop becoming about the students and being about the teachers. I can say 80% of teachers teaching right now do not care what the students learn all they care about is teaching to tests so they make themselves look better.
11 Monday, 21 February 2011 04:42
Lets Be Real
In response to Mr. Costantino about his statement, "I suspect if you ask those contemplating education as a career if their motivation is the salary, few would agree." We all understand where you are coming from but the fact of the matter is that in today's world everything rely's on the shoulder's of money. I believe that people do have love for their jobs but the way of the world today is that no one can afford to do it for free. I also believe that if this subject was not about anything but money their would be no arguements on this subject at all. I think the world needs to be more realistic and realize that money is what drives our motivation in today's society to actually do a job and do it correctly. Do you agree?
10 Wednesday, 28 April 2010 23:01
Jack Costantino
My wife has been a dedicated educator for over 35 years. She works frequently with special needs children and specializes in communicative disorders. I have been privileged to watch her and her colleagues at work. In my view, my wife and those like her perform heroic tasks on a daily basis.

It's impossible to quantify the life changing influence provided by of our professional educators. Until, at years end, you read the personal notes from parents and heartfelt expressions of appreciation of the students themselves, the real meaning of a teachers work may escape us. Many of these students will live far better lives as a result of the help they get integrating productively in society.

If you have any doubts...simply join my wife for a walk down a local street, visit a shop, mall, restaurant or theater...and marvel at the smiles, waves and hugs which spontaneously occur from her "kids" and their parents. Some of those "kids" are not kids any more. They're functional young adults who "still remember" and appreciate more than ever what they learned and those who taught them.

And yet traditionally, compared with many other professions, education has been the least appreciated, valued and compensated. I suspect if you ask those contemplating education as a career if their motivation is the salary, few would agree. So what is it? Summers off? My wife has, and others still do work in summer programs or other jobs for half of their vacations to afford the high cost of living and especially in NJ. As a carpenter our combined income allows us to pay the bills while we're still working. As we press closer to retirement our combined social security, her pension and a few bucks squirreled away at barely 1% interest will be what we live on until they slam the lid.

For us and most others health insurance coverage translates as income. Try buying it privately! Worse yet...try being sick without it. Giving it back along with a reduction in pension...even in the seemingly small percentages published, will definitely hurt those like us who chose the path of basic worker bees and have shown up for work for 30 or 40 years in a row.

The Governor's strategy of an ultimatum to force veteran teachers into retirement will undoubtedly have the desired affect. Unfortunately it will have an undesired affect on the children in need of their experitse, compassion and dedication...but perhaps the most devasting affect will be on the psyche of young and entry level educators who will understand by example that they are destined for the same outcome. This is a bitter pill for those on their way out after a lifetime of service, but it also serves to put their replacements on notice that their altruism will not equate with appreciation where the rubber meets the road.

How this realization will result in, or sustain a motivated, encouraged and professional educational system seems a bit mysterious to me...I suppose we'll see somewhere down the road...
9 Wednesday, 14 April 2010 14:39
life long educator
"For somebody (senior and higher paid teachers) who does not want to contribute to health care costs, they can retire before August 1 and get their full benefits. This way, a school district will have the opportunity to hire new employees who are less expensive. It will help immediately in fiscal year 11 (2010-11).''"

Looks like the "guv" wants the veteran educators to retire. What a shame. A mass exodus will create "a perfect storm", especially in science, math, special education and world languages. We can't find enough talent in these areas as it is. The kids will be short changed by this short sightedness, but it doesn't appear as though the quality of the public educational product is of any concern to the Governor or the Commissioner. Oh wait...their kids go to private school...
8 Wednesday, 14 April 2010 14:19
Master of Fins
He will go down in NJ History as one of the most irresponsible and damaging Governors we've ever had. The sad thing is, he won't be around to blame for the damage because he'll be gone in four... and they'll blame whoever he's replaced with. He makes Whitman look like Nelson Mandela.

He and his buddy George W. are laughing their way to their estates while America fixes the problems caused by their inadequacies.

In New Jersey - you get what you pay for. Yea, it's more expensive to live here; but with that expense you got top flight public education, beautiful properties, cultural diversity (something a lot of Republicans hate but are sure to exploit), and access to the most powerful cities in the World.

If you don't want to pay a premium to live here, move to the Midwest. If I have to pay more to have access to what most of the country doesn't have, so be it.

Everyone accuses the NJEA of whining?! Listen to the bloggers and comments (and 101.5). Who is crying? People fear the NJEA because they are educated and powerful. They have played the system beautifully and all within the means of the law.

The Republican Party is dieing and its because we are becoming educated... it's what they've always feared ... an intelligent populous who questions their leadership. Christie will only destroy the Republicans even more... why don't you have some of your winners down in Washington come support you Christie? Why not get the incredibly bright Sarah Palin to stump for you.

Hahaha. Don't worry NJ - it'll be over soon.
7 Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:00
MADELINE
Wow 10 yrs and a masters.This is my first yr teaching and I started close to 50 with just my bachelors. I might get laid off which is absolutely fine with me because I will collect and get my masters!!
6 Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:57
Special Education Teacher
I pay 15% of my health benefit package. My husband, a union truck driver for 18 years, paid ZIP! He also paid nothing into his pension fund. I am forced to pay 5% of my salary into a fund that may not be there when I can retire. Teachers aren't the ones getting the so-called FREE health benefits. Look at other jobs to see what they get. We gave up higher salaries for the benefits that we have. Over 70% of teachers in this state do pay a significant amount for their benefit package. On top of what we pay up front we also have deductibles that we pay like everyone else. If you come to our school between the hours of 7AM and 7PM on just about every school day you will find a teacher there working way beyond their contracted hours. After school help, parent conferences, preparing for the next day or the next unit, and doing the endless flood of paperwork that we are encumbered with are just some of the things that we do without getting paid for it. One teacher I know counted up the extra hours that she worked per year and it came out to 5 WEEKS! We do this because we love what we do. We don't have to work the extra time, or provide help after school for the child who is struggling. We do it for the kids.
5 Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:36
teacher
Does anyone understand how the salary increases from contract negotiations works? If the contract states that the teachers get a 4% increase for each of the 3 years of the contract, the public thinks the teachers are getting a 12% raise. No way! What happens is that the lump sum of all of the teachers' salaries is increased by 4% the first year, as well as in subsequent years. Then they have to figure out the "steps" on the guide. For instance the salary guide may state that between steps 1 and 2 there is a 2% difference, between 2 and 3 there is a 2.5% difference, etc. So once the money is filtered into the steps, there are MANY steps where the teachers get way less than a 4% raise. The bulk of the money is in the lower half of the guide. Teachers at the top of the guide who make the most money often only see a 1% or 1.5% increase.

Another comment about salary and benefits, doesn't every job have its perks? For instance if you are in marketing or purchasing, maybe you get paid to travel. Or if you are in banking or finance, maybe you get a huge yearly bonus. My opinion is, you choose the career that is right for you. If you have sour grapes about the perks someone else has in their career, then switch careers and quit complaining.
4 Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:32
teach
I have been teaching for 10 years(in the public system), with my masters and 100 hours of professional development per year, and earn $54k. Have YOU been at the same career for 10 years and make LESS?? Know your facts, don't generalize. Also, your a dad? What caliber of teachers would you like educating your child, because at this rate, incoming teachers are running into other professions and your children are going to suffer, not current teachers.
3 Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:06
Former science teacher
In my previous private sector job, I made 2.4x what I subsequently earned as a science teacher in a public high school. Between shortages of a variety of resources (textbooks, paper, even chairs), chronic student discipline problems, endless paperwork and continuing ed requirements, it was the most stressful, demanding job I've ever had. There were five other math/science people I knew who went through the same process. None of us lasted more than 2 years in any of the public high-school positions we landed. (A number of us are now safely back in the private sector, working for more pay and better working conditions.) Getting qualified people in math and the sciences to go into teaching has been difficult for years; I can only see it getting substantially harder given the current atmosphere.
2 Tuesday, 13 April 2010 14:29
just fine
Cry a little harder NJEA.

Schundler said that while Christie cut $418 million for "non-school purposes,'' he increased aid for classrooms by $238 million. "That's a 2.4 percent increase in state funding for school districts amidst the greatest economic downturn since the Great Depression.‘'

Stop being so fat.
1 Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:59
GeekyDad
In my private sector job, in which I do NOT make more than the average NJ teacher at my education and experience level, I pay 18% of my benefits -- and that's considered generous in the private sector these days.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**