newjerseynewsroom.com

Tuesday
Feb 07th

N.J. children with Nazi-inspired names taken from parents

gavelgold121409_optBY JOE TYRRELL
NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM

The state Division of Youth and Family Services was right to take three small children with Nazi-inspired names away from their parents.

A three-judge panel ruled DYFS "proved the need for protective services" for Adolf Hitler Campbell, 4, JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell, 3, and Honszlynn Hinler Jeannie Campbell, 2.

The judges overturned a Family Court ruling that there was insufficient evidence that the parents had abused or neglected the children. That ruling was stayed to allow the children's legal guardian and DYFS to appeal.

In reversing, the appellate judges said the Family Court decision relied on "an overly narrow view of domestic violence in the context of abuse or neglect of children."

DYFS removed the children in January 2009 from the custody of their unemployed parents, Heath and Deborah Campbell of Holland Township.

 

The family attracted attention a month earlier, when Heath Campbell complained that an area supermarket would not put his son's name on a birthday cake.

DYFS investigated after complaints that the children had been strapped into booster seats for prolonged periods in the home, a charge that Deborah Campbell denied.

But the judges noted the situation grew more serious when a neighbor contacted authorities, saying Deborah Campbell had passed along a letter saying her husband had threatened "to have me killed or kill me himself."

DYFS investigators noticed the bedroom windows were nailed shut, and reported Heath Campbell had the couple's car and only active cellphone. A caseworker tried to persuade Deborah Campbell to accompany the children to a safe haven.

But the judges noted that she "angrily asked whether she was being forced to choose between her children and her husband, and then said, 'Take them.""

Both parents suffer psychological and other disabilities and are poorly educated, with Heath Campbell illiterate, according to the decision by Judges Anthony Parrillo, Marie Lihotz and Victor Ashrafi. Both parents were abused as children, the judges said.

The ruling also found the Family Court should have considered accusations from one of heath Campbell's previous wives that he abused her and their two children. The judges noted he does not see or support his other children.

Although at times Deborah Campbell denied writing the note, a psychologist who interviewed the parents and observed them with the children reported a "significant level of actual risk," the judges wrote.

The psychologist, Dr. Alice Nadelman reported neither parent showed "the psychological capacity... to provide safe and appropriate parental care on their own."

Joe Tyrrell may be reached at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

 
Comments (3)
3 Saturday, 21 August 2010 09:56
jts1488
Am I hearing this right? Children were taken away from their parents initially because of their names.........their names? Is this the actual thought police at work? The next time I see a couple with children named Saddam, Joseph (Stalin) or Charles (Manson) ,the names of mass murderers I am going to call the law. Maybe the children can be drug through the courts parent-less for years to come at the expense of taxpayers because I find their names offensive.This sounds a lot like Iran , hell maybe we should stone them to death too.
2 Friday, 06 August 2010 05:39
Judicial Activism
At first glance it appears there was no violation of any law that would allow the court to terminate the parents rights. This is convenient because it relieved the State of any obligation to help people it somehow believed to be gernerally troubled and in trouble, allowed them to wash their hands of any obligation to help the parents by villifing them, and in order to bring about the judges' personal preference terminated their parental rights.

In fact, the only conclusion one can draw from the opinion of the the appellate court is the Government lacked any violation of the law that justified the terminiation of the parents rights and had to invent one.

The appellate court found - by a preponderance of evidence (thats how weak the evidence seems to be) - there was no "Domestic Violence" within the meaning of the statute and thus reinvented the meaning of "domestic violence" using a suspect psychological theory; because I'm an expert and I say so (junk science) engrafted onto a completely seperate statute.
1 Thursday, 05 August 2010 17:04
Jrz Wrld
Really? Do you think maybe that people who name their children after famous Nazis might not have a little something else going on besides the simple desire to name their children after famous Nazis? Everybody started bawling about their civil rights, not seeming to care that there could very well be other issues of legitimate concern. DYFS can't air all this stuff to the public since it's a case involving minors. But we do know from news reports that police had been repeatedly called to that house, that the father has a history of domestic violence and that they tried to bring Mrs. Campbell's drunk mother to a hearing so that SHE could take custody of the kids. These people are flat out incompetent, if not dangerous, parents. I hope their parental rights are terminated and someone adopts those kids into a loving home.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**