Rep. Frank LoBiondo scrutinized for earmark spending | State | -- Your State. Your News.

May 28th
  • Login
  • Create an account
  • Search
  • Local Business Deals

Rep. Frank LoBiondo scrutinized for earmark spending

lobiondofrank020812_optBY JOE TYRRELL

The long-standing but controversial congressional practice of "earmarking" appropriations for particular projects has put two South Jersey representatives in an unwanted spotlight.

In an ongoing series on congressional ethics, The Washington Post listed New Jersey Congressman Frank LoBiondo (R-2nd Dist.) among 33 members who in recent years have directed more than $300 million in federal funds into areas where they own commercial or residential property.

In a related story, the newspaper noted that Rep. Robert Andrews (D-1st Dist.) had obtained federal funding for Rutgers-Camden Law School, where his wife is an associate dean. That is old news in New Jersey, where it was a 2008 campaign issue.

Andrews said the money funds a scholarship program that requires students to provide legal services to poor residents of Camden. In 2007, he obtained an ethics opinion that cleared the practice.

The congressional process of funneling portions of appropriations to specific projects normally is legal. But these earmarks have come under closer scrutiny in the following revelations about the increasing wealth of many in Congress, and questions about the impact of their legislative actions on their personal incomes.

After approving a record $32 billion in earmarks in 2010, lawmakers agreed to a moratorium on earmarks, although some members complain that has merely led to camouflaging them. The Senate last week approved measures to require members to disclose information about their mortgages, prohibit congressional insider trading, strip pensions from those ousted for corruption and require political intelligence operatives to register. But the Senators defeated an effort to ban earmarks.

Still, the Senate reforms won support from good-government groups. But it faces a buzzsaw in the House of Representatives.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington today criticized House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) for "cynically" substituting what it called "a watered-down version" of the bill that would keep most of the current system in place.

In LoBiondo's case, the Post reported that he secured almost $4.7 million for beach replenishment and monitoring in Ventnor, where he owns a home, and Atlantic City. In response, LoBiondo's office released a statement saying he has worked to secure funds for communities along the Jersey Shore and the Delaware Bay "without consideration of the financial impact to himself."

Comments (2)
2 Wednesday, 15 February 2012 08:28
Black Sheep Boy
This is absurd, criticizing the Congressman for seeking beach replenishment, as if he wouldn't have sought BEACH REPLENISHMENT if he'd lived onshore. How about flat out, blatantly lying to a Courier-Post editorial board interview about his true position on the 2007 Iraq troop surge with my trying in vain to tell Mike Daniels (chief editorial writer) that he's lying again, in real time, with me sitting 12 inches away protesting. See I was his 2010 opponent and I hope to be his 2012 opponent? See ...GET THIS... I actually filed an ethics complaint with the "office of Congressional Ethics" concerning LoBi's corruption of the 2009 AND 2010 election cycle caused by said lie. They will not, have not, given any status updates, maybe because they view me as a punk. So, where do we go from here? Perhaps take a look at my web site.... ....where I just posted a home made spin off of the movie "Caine Mutiny" staring Bogart, Van Johnson and Frank LoBiondo. No one takes me seriously in this very serious business I'm engaged in, therefore I'm entitled to be as snarky as I chose.
1 Thursday, 09 February 2012 08:55
Nelson Gaskill
Congressman LoBiondo has sought funding for Beach Replenshment up and down the South Jersey shoreline. The beachs are why most people visit the South Jersey Shore area. This article wrongfully insinuates it was done for nefarious reasons. Please do some research and learn how important the Tourism Industry is to the state of New Jersey.

Add your comment

Your name:

Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509