Dislikes idea of postponing pension contributions
Barbara Keshishian, president of New Jersey Education Association, the statewide teachers' union, Thursday reacted with concenr to Gov. Chris Christie's decision to cut state education aid by $475 million and to refuse any contributions to the state's pension funds.
"The NJEA understands this crisis is real, and that the budget must be balanced,'' Keshishian said. "The governor's proposal to cut state education aid would not be advisable under normal circumstances. These are not normal circumstances, but like many of the band-aids and gimmicks of prior years that he justifiably condemns, his order could have serious unintended consequences for the future of our public schools.''
Keshishian said many school districts use the excess surplus funds from one budget year as revenue to support programs or property tax reductions the following year.
"With this order, the burden is on the governor to ensure that he has adequate funding in his fiscal year (2010-11) FY2011 budget to fund the public schools of New Jersey, she said. "With this order, he has assumed full responsibility for maintaining the future quality of the state's public schools, which are among the very best in the nation.
We are also distressed that the governor has announced his intention to continue the destructive practice of not funding the state's pension funds,'' Keshishian added. "It is precisely that failure by prior governors and prior legislatures that has led to the underfunding of the pension system. Teachers and school employees have contributed billions of dollars to that system in the past 15 years while the state has consistently failed to contribute its fair share.''
Keshishian described as outrageous that Christie "would openly encourage the Legislature to continue the fiscally irresponsible practices that have brought us to this point.''
"The NJEA's goal is to protect the best public education system in America, and we will never abandon that goa,'' she said. "It is the responsibility of the governor and the Legislature to ensure that today's public schools — and those of tomorrow — have the resources they need to educate the next generation of children at the highest levels.
Cutting their budgets is not the path to that goal. It is the path to educational ruin.
— TOM HESTER SR., NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM
Twitter
Myspace
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Slashdot
Furl
Yahoo
Technorati
Newsvine
Facebook
People ask, why should the unions get something I haven't? Well, flip it...why aren't more people asking, why should I be forced to give up decent pay, health benefits?
I have worked in both public and private sector. In private sector, we had union workers in some positions. This also benefited the non-union people, as it was hard for the company to justify giving the factory workers better benefits than those in the office.
Destroy unions, and you destroy the groups that do have enough strength to stand up for keeping benefits and pensions...and when they don't have them, there is even less chance of anyone else getting them either.
I have taught part-time for approximately the same 15 years, and if it weren't for my regular, full-time job, I would never be able to donate my time and teach. My teacher friend and I VOLUNTARILY started a percussion ensemble for kids. For 13 years, I've not received a dime, nor did he. I considered becoming a full-time teacher, but the pay cut would've been over 50%; I don't know anyone who could afford that.
In the past 15 years, I've seen very dedicated, hard-working teachers that are attempting to teach kids distracted by text messages and Facebook. From what I've seen, these teachers deserve every penny they earn, because they truly do earn their pay.