newjerseynewsroom.com

Saturday
Feb 04th

Sweeney says he'll make N.J. public employee pension and benefits' reform a priority

sweeneygcnjus012510_optThe state Senate will begin the 2010 legislative session by seeking swift action on measures that would complete a sweeping overhaul of the public employee pension and benefits system first proposed nearly three years ago, Senate President Stephen M. Sweeney (D-Gloucester) announced Monday.

Sweeney made the announcement following a meeting with the Senate Democratic majority.

"Unless we take action now, New Jersey's pension system will implode, leaving thousands of rank and file workers penniless in retirement," Sweeney said. "As a union leader and someone who helps provide health and retirement plans to workers in the private sector, I know that a promise of a secure retirement must be a promise kept. But the state will have no option but to renege on that promise for its public employees unless we reform the system. It's time to finish the job we began nearly four years ago."

 

Sweeney said he is seeking a dialogue with state worker unions, the Christie administration and fellow legislators to build common ground on the initiative.

"We owe it to New Jerseyans to move forward on pension and benefits reform," said Senate Majoirty Leader Barbara Buono (D-Middlesex). "The state will never dig itself out of this budget hole or shore up its finances until we overhaul the way we provide for pensions and benefits."

The various state pension plans are underfunded by approximately $30 billion and due to the economic recession, the state and many cities and towns are facing the possibility of not being able to meet their annual pension obligations.

Sweeney said the Senate will review several reforms proposed by the 2006 Special Session on Property Tax Reform's Joint Legislative Committee on Pension and Benefits Reform. The bipartisan, bicameral committee made 41 specific recommendations to overhaul the public employee pension and benefits system to ensure its long-term viability for career state employees. Fifteen recommendations were enacted legislatively and other changes were achieved through collective bargaining.

The joint committee was the only one of four where all Democratic and Republican members agreed upon the final set of recommendations.

"The Senate must be prepared to tackle the unfinished business of the joint session," Sweeney said. "Three years after the special session ended, applying its bipartisan recommendations is more important than ever."

Among the concepts that Sweeney said the Senate must revisit include rolling-back a nine-percent increase legislatively enacted in 2001 which resulted in a significant increase in the pension fund's unfunded liability, increasing the number of "high salary" years used to calculate pension benefits from the average of three years to the average of at least five years, requiring all part-time employees to enroll into a defined contribution plan instead of the pension system and allowing all current non-vested public employees to opt into a defined contribution retirement plan.

"Getting a handle on the amount spent on pensions and benefits will help governments at all levels relieve the tremendous fiscal stress they face now and in the future," said Sen. Paul Sarlo (D-Bergen), Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee chairman. "Taxpayers and career public servants can both come out winners from a system that is built on a foundation of common sense."

Sweeney said he has asked legislative staff to begin drafting legislation on the remaining measures, so they can be introduced and ready for consideration by the Senate State Government Committee.

Gov. Chris Christie said Sweeney is sending a signal that bipartisan action is critical to reforming the pension and benefits system.

“I applaud the Senate leadership’s decision to complete the sweeping overhaul of the public employee pension and benefits system that was first proposed over three years ago,'' Christie said. "The only way to ease New Jersey’s fiscal pain and close our budget gap is by working together to fundamentally change the way government operates and today’s move is a very positive first step.”

— TOM HESTER SR., NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM

 
Comments (4)
4 Wednesday, 05 January 2011 13:14
Shirley S
I do not believe it's fair to touch the pension of workers who are already in it. Even if they wanted to grandfather it someway and say, the new pension reform only applies to those with say 10 years of service or less. However, to change someone's pension benefits who have been a part of the system for 15 or 20 years plus is so unfair. Everything should remain the same for employees with all of these years meaning pension based on salary for the last 3 years, and early retirement at 25 years of service or the age 55. The public workers are the lowest paid, and always catches the short end of the stick, because even on our jobs, we are worked as race horses while administrators make all of the big money and even know how to use Microsoft Office suite, let alone, sign on to the email. Unreal.
3 Saturday, 20 March 2010 04:39
CAMMY
I've been working as a public school employee for 31 years. When I started working (at $10K) a year, I was told it was ok that I didn't make a lot of money; when I retired, I'd have a pension and benefits. For all of these years despite the fact that I hold a Master's degree, I made a LOT less than my friends and relatives. I urge our state legislators NOT to touch the pension configuration for those of us who have contributed for many years. This change will lessen our pensions by 8%. I have been paying into this system faithfully for all of these years AND paying my fair share of property taxes to the state. I wasn't fiscally irresponsible; the state leaders were. Please don't make us pay for their mismanagement.
2 Monday, 08 February 2010 18:51
Leonard Carroll
The problem is, the only part that's "broken" about the pension system isn't so much the pension or the benefits. It's that legislatures and governors haven't funded it for 15 years.
State workers work and pay into pensions for there futures if your going to brake ours further; then take from your pensions and give back your 14% for the last 4 years raises talk of fare! We state workers waited and then waited again for the need of a state that does not appreciate the time energy and services we provide for them.
1 Saturday, 06 February 2010 12:17
Howard Jacobs
This sound like a great idea if only I could do the same with the money I owe the bank for my mortgage and the rest of my bills. Maybe Mr. Sweeney can pass the same type of legislation that will allow me to do the same. If he can do that than I would not need my pension after 25+ years of state service.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**