newjerseynewsroom.com

Tuesday
Feb 07th

Urban-suburban school funding gap widens

abc052009_optEducation Law Center study finds 18.3% jump in funding disparity

Just as the experts predicted, the gap in per pupil funding between urban and suburban school districts in New Jersey has widened in only the first year under the State’s new school funding formula.

An analysis of K-12 per pupil revenue by Education Law Center (ELC) shows that the gap in overall funding between wealthy, suburban districts (District Factor Groups I & J) and poor, urban (“Abbott”) districts rose from $901 to $1066 in just one school year. That’s an 18.3% jump in funding disparity.

Parents and equity advocates have warned that the School Funding Reform Act (SFRA) will recreate one of New Jersey’s most tragic legacies of the past: the unequal playing field between poor students in urban districts and more affluent students in suburban districts. As a result of the landmark N.J. Supreme Court rulings in Abbott v. Burke, that sad legacy ended in 1997.

"The NAACP is convinced that the current SFRA will lead to backward steps in our press for justice and equality," said James E. Harris, President of the New Jersey State Conference of the NAACP. "The NAACP continues to insist that Abbott is New Jersey's equivalent to the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision. We believe that if fully implemented, the Abbott mandates hold the greatest promise for equal educational opportunity for all children, which is in the best interests of all citizens of the state."

The SFRA formula reinstates the urban-suburban funding gap. If the gap continues to widen at an 18% annual clip, it won’t take long before students in urban districts once again find themselves far behind their more affluent peers when it comes to educational resources and opportunities.

Bottom line: the SFRA means that spending and achievement levels in suburban districts will continue at high levels, while urban districts will be forced to cut those programs, services and staff needed to raise achievement among the state’s most disadvantaged children.

The ELC analysis also shows that in the 2009-10 school year Abbott districts will spend slightly less per pupil than middle income districts, though both groups will spend approximately $1,000 less than the I & J districts.

A district-by-district analysis carried out by ELC shows that more than two-thirds of urban districts will spend less per pupil next year than suburban districts. For example, Newark will spend $10,492 per pupil, with Paterson spending $10,151, and Jersey City spending $10,467, while I & J districts will spend, on average, $11,535.

“The SFRA has already begun to take its toll,” said David G. Sciarra, ELC Executive Director. “The formula seriously under-funds urban students and schools, and this will reverse the historic and measurable educational progress made under the Abbott rulings.”

For an explanation of the determination of per pupil revenue in Abbott districts, read Busting the Abbott Myths – Myth#1: Abbott Districts Spend the Most Per Pupil.

For more on how the SFRA formula is already failing New Jersey’s public school children, see New School Aid Formula Underfunded by $300 Million.

— ANDY LAGOMARSINO, NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM

 
Comments (2)
2 Thursday, 21 May 2009 11:13
School observer
Let's try to take it a notch above your alma mater, guys, and dig a little deeper. Don't just proofread and post news releases by organizations. This is nothing more than a publicity effort by the ELC to support its case before the Supreme Court. The issue is not whether the "parity" remedy is being achieved, but rather whether the system established by SFRA is meeting the state's education obligations under the constitution and, therefore, could replace parity. The court originally came up with parity (i.e., the Abbotts must spend at the same level as the most wealthy districts) because of an absence of a definition of a "thorough and efficient education." The state is now saying that the new funding law provides that definition, along with adequate funding to meet the standard. Consequently, according to the state, the parity remedy is no longer needed.
1 Wednesday, 20 May 2009 14:58
DJ
Just what has all of the $$$ spent in the Abbotts done over the last 13 years? Lowered drop out rates? Higher test scores? More corruption? More money wasted? Find a way to fund the education of these kids directly, without the waste and fraud that has happened over the last decade, then we'll talk! All I see are highly paid administrations, and the same old run down buildings, or places like Newark, where they have enough money to build a new arena, but not enough to educate the kids!

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**