Share this
Twitter
Myspace
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Slashdot
Furl
Yahoo
Technorati
Newsvine
Facebook
Export PDF
Print
E-mail
At first glance it appears there was no violation of any law that would allow the court to terminate the parents rights. This is convenient because it relieved the State of any obligation to help people it somehow believed to be gernerally troubled and in trouble, allowed them to wash their hands of any obligation to help the parents by villifing them, and in order to bring about the judges' personal preference terminated their parental rights.
In fact, the only conclusion one can draw from the opinion of the the appellate court is the Government lacked any violation of the law that justified the terminiation of the parents rights and had to invent one.
The appellate court found - by a preponderance of evidence (thats how weak the evidence seems to be) - there was no "Domestic Violence" within the meaning of the statute and thus reinvented the meaning of "domestic violence" using a suspect psychological theory; because I'm an expert and I say so (junk science) engrafted onto a completely seperate statute.
newjerseynewsroom.com
Saturday
May 26th
You really need to read the opinion
This is a comment on "N.J. children with Nazi-inspired names taken from parents"
Comments (1)
Legal Kidnapping of Children in NJ
1
Friday, 22 October 2010 20:11
Ronald Johnston
18-month-old boy removed from home due to "argument" in front of child...4 years laters after every hurdle was jumped by each parent, DYFS decides to find a 4th psychologist "specialist" in termination cases ... surprise... and her "opinion" is that the boy is "bonded" to foster mother who admitted in court SHE HIT the boy with a hairbrush, ER report states "physical abuse by foster mother" boy returned by same judge. He's not bonded, he's scared to death of her & the DYFS transport aide even testified in court that the boy was afraid to go back after he was removed due to the abuse. Foster family psychological report reads like an episode of the Twilight Zone including alcoholism, mental problems, aggravated assault charges, children removed for "head injuries". Foster family's other 2 adopted boys (20 years ago)....now 1 confined to the NJ State Mental Institution & the other admitted alcoholic. The DAG tells appellate court "we don't even know if any domestic violence occurred when the boy was removed because the mother told so many lies"....so bottom line, let's have him adopted by the foster mother who admitted hitting him. This boy has a loving father with a Masters Degree from Italy, full-time city job & even went as an invited guest to the White House as an artist in 2008. Why? the father is an immigrant who speaks broken English and the judge said "I don't like you and I'll make sure you never get your son" 7 months BEFORE the Guardianship Trial. Action needs to be taken now before it is too late for the family unit in NJ. email me at ronaldjohnston23@yahoo.com I have audio, video, digital and DYFS documents to prove all this.
Reply