newjerseynewsroom.com

Thursday
Aug 16th

Chris Christie as potential Romney running mate could account for poll disparities

BY PATRICK MURRAY
COMMENTARY

There have been a couple of queries about Gov. Christie’s poll ratings released by Monmouth University/NJ Press Media this week compared to the numbers put out by Quinnipiac University last week. Among registered voters, Monmouth has the governor’s positive job rating at 50 percent while Quinnipiac put it at 59 percent.

Each organization’s prior polls put the governor’s approval at 55 percent. In other words, Quinnipiac zigged (up 4 points) while Monmouth zagged (down 5 points). Why?

There have been 17 occasions over the past six years where Monmouth and Quinnipiac released New Jersey governor ratings within two weeks of one another. These most recent results mark the largest ever difference between the two.

Since Chris Christie took office, the two organizations released three polls prior to today that were conducted within two weeks of one another. In each of those instances, the governor’s job approval rating differed by exactly 3 points – in two instances the Quinnipiac number was higher, while it was lower in the other.

It’s worth taking a dive into the two polls’ demographics to see if anything there accounts for the difference. Overall, the polls have very similar racial compositions, but Monmouth includes more cell phone interviews (19 percent compared to 12.5 percent for Quinnipiac). This probably leads to a somewhat younger voter group for Monmouth. In our most recent poll, 24 percent of the voter sample was under the age of 30. Quinnipiac did not release their age demographics, but past polls hovered between 18 percent and 20 percent. Younger voters tend to be more Democratic in their political leaning, so this could have an impact.

In fact, there are notable differences in the partisan composition of the two samples. Monmouth’s poll puts self-identified Democrats at 37 percent and Republicans at 23 percent – a 14 point difference. Quinnipiac’s sample is 34 percentDemocratic and 25 percent Republican – a smaller 9 point gap.

Over the last 9 months, Quinnipiac released 6 New Jersey polls and Monmouth released 4. The Democratic advantage in Quinnipiac’s sample ranged from 6 to 12 points during that time. Monmouth’s Democratic edge was larger, but more stable at 13 to 14 points. New Jersey’s voter rolls puts the registered partisan split at 33 percent Democratic to 20 percent Republican – a 13 point gap.

During the past few months, Monmouth’s voter sample ranged from 34 to 37 percent Democratic and 20 to 23 percent Republican. Quinnipiac’s polls ranged from 32 to 35 percent Democratic and 23 to 27 percent Republican. That means Monmouth’s sample tends to be 1 to 4 points more Democratic and a similar 0 to 3 points more Republican than the official voter rolls. Quinnipiac’s partisan sample tends to range near the Democratic registration numbers – from 1 point below to 2 points above – but is consistently 3 to 7 points higher in its Republican share of registered voters.

All this explains why Quinnpiac’s gubernatorial ratings have been more “Republican” than Monmouth’s in seven of the last eight polls conducted in close proximity of one another. However, it doesn’t explain why the job ratings diverged so much in their recent poll releases.

So, we turn our attention to another culprit: the questionnaire. Both Monmouth and Quinnipiac use consistent question wording when rating the governor. Monmouth also makes sure the question appears in exactly the same spot on the questionnaire each time we conduct a non-election poll – for the record, that would be question #2, after a general evaluation of the state of New Jersey.

Quinnipiac, on the other hand plays around with the order in which they ask the governor’s job rating question. In 8 polls over the past year, they asked Gov. Christie’s job rating as the first question in 3 cases and the 3rd question in one case. For the remaining four polls, the governor’s rating question was slotted from #10 and #13 in their questionnaire.

When it was the first question, the governor’s positive job rating was only 44 to 47 percent. At the number 3 slot, it was 53 percent. At #10 or later in the interview, it ranged from 55 to 59 percent. It's worth noting that the lower poll numbers came early last year, and were either closer to or even lower than other polls conducted at that time. Hmmm.

In the most recent Quinnipiac poll, one of the questions preceding Gov. Christie’s rating presented him as a potential nominee for Vice President. In other words, the survey framed the governor as a national figure before asking voters to rate his job performance. Could this be why his rating among Republican voters in particular shot up to an astronomical 92 percent?

Pollsters know that job approval ratings can be impacted by the context of a poll interview. That’s why most pollsters try to place these key trend questions in the same place in every questionnaire. This increases our confidence that any changes in a politician’s ratings are due to real shifts in opinion and not an artifact of questionnaire inconsistencies.

I’m willing to venture that first naming Chris Christie as Mitt Romney’s potential running mate before asking New Jerseyans to rate their governor might have had a wee bit to do with the two polls’ divergent trends.

Other theories are most welcome.

Patrick Murray, a Camden County native, is the director of the Monmouth University Polling Institute.

RECENT COLUMNS BY PATRICK MURRAY

Are Obama and Christie really closing N.J.'s gender gap?

Gay marriage, civil rights issues do not belong on a N.J. referendum ballot

What Nevada says about Mitt Romney's ability to seal the deal

Republicans against Mitt Romney are doing Obama campaign's work

Gay marriage bill in N.J. is also a Democratic ploy

Romney's Iowa win is a victory for Gov. Chris Christie

Newt Gingrich can thank the mainstream media for his rise

N.J. Election Day 2011: Will the GOP make history?

Thoughts on New Jersey's Congressional redistricting

A genuine Sweeney tirade is trouble for Gov. Christie

Gov. Christie is losing New Jersey independents

 
Comments (1)
1 Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:13
Richard Petersen
Yah! if that's the case I bet Romney doesn't get elected. We have a governor in Jersey who likes budget cuts first and foremost in my opinion and where it hurts most. Closing of Developmental centers in NJ and putting those who can't take care of themselves in harms way. Or maybe he just doesn't understand.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

Children can be conned out of inheritance after multiple marriages

BY CAROL ABAYA NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM THE SANDWICH GENERATION Multiple marriages and blended families can mean children get cheated out of money and assets their parent(s) earned and had before the second or third marriage. At the 2012 senior citizens’ law day conference, Lawrence A. Friedman, Bridgewater elder law attorney, said elders need to protect their children of prior marriages from being disinherited. "Even if your spouse’s current will provides for your children, your spouse may change it after you pass away,” he said. In addition to protecting one's child, an appropriate will can minimize N.J. estate taxes, which kick in if assets are over $675,000. At the conference, Cathyanne Pisciotta from North Brunswick discussed guardianship which could be necessary if various legal documents are not signed. Pisciotta said that if a person does not have a durable power of attorney (for financial affairs) and a living will (for medical decisions), anyone else can seek guardianship of that person. An expensive court proceeding is mandatory. And she said, “If one person seeks guardianship, someone else can challenge the appointment. Another relative may seek to be appointed guardian because he/she wants the money and power.”

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com


**V 2.0**