newjerseynewsroom.com

Monday
Jun 06th

Christie can cut billions more from N.J. budget if he really believes in limited government

SabrinM012810_optBY MURRAY SABRIN
COMMENTARY

Governor Christie's first budget was passed by the Legislature before the June 30th deadline, but not before three Republican holdouts, Michael Doherty in the Senate and Allison Littell McHose and Michael Patrick Carroll in the Assembly vowed not to vote for the $29.4 billion budget and the supplemental bills containing tax hikes.

After the last minute give-and-take, the three most fiscal conservative members of the Legislature "held their noses" and signed on. The Governor signed the budget bill at a ceremony in South River, reiterating that the state needs a constitutional amendment that would cap annual property tax hikes at 2.5%.

Governor Christie's property tax cap allows residents to override the 2.5% cap. What is the point of a cap then? Self government means that voters should be able to determine how much they want to spend on municipal services and schools. Local officials are supposed to be held accountable to voters who "hire" them at every election. If the officials are not good stewards of the public's money, they should be fired by the voters when they seek another term in office.

If homeowners and residents in upper income towns want to increase spending on municipal services by 5% or more, they should go for it. After all, it's their money. The governor should not object to self government. Besides, a 2.9% cap is an unwarranted interference in local governance.

To limit property tax increases, state government should give mayors and council as well as boards of education the tools to negotiate with police and teachers' unions so taxpayers are not raked over the coals. Municipalities should not be at a disadvantage in negotiating with unions over salaries and work rules. Eliminating police salary arbitration should be the first reform enacted.

However, the Governor and the Legislature are not addressing the real issues facing the state: the redistribution of income from the suburbs to the cities, the unfairness of school property taxes and the entitlement philosophy that undermines most state spending.

The solution to the redistribution of income and high property taxes is 1) phasing out the state income tax over the next three years so residents around the state will have more of their money to pay for local services; 2) municipalities should charge fees for services; 3) and phasing out the entitlement spending that is driving costs higher every year in the state.

For example, in towns with swimming pools, like the one I used to live in, the town charged a fee to use the facility. This principle could be extended to libraries and schools. In fact, schools are "outsourcing" summer school this year; parents have to pay tuition for classed their children will be taking. In the fall, schools are implementing athletic fees. In other words, fees for services are being introduced in towns to deal with the fiscal crisis.

The next fiscal reform should be phasing out school property taxes over the next three years. The angst over property taxes will end once-and-for-all as municipalities no longer tax to fund public education. Parents would be in charge of education spending as teachers and administrators would have to structure the nonprofit schools for optimal performance — high quality and reasonable costs. In short, the empowerment of parents in education decisions would be maximized.

Critics will object that the "dismantling of public education" will be intolerable for children, but what they really mean is that they don't want to eliminate the public school monopoly. Frederic Bastiat said it best more than 150 years ago:

"Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all."

And entitlement spending too must be phased out. Nonprofit institutions should be responsible for delivering health, counseling and other services the state, counties and local governments now provide. Phasing out of government welfare spending does not mean that people should suffer. On the contrary, it means the people of New Jersey would contribute directly to the best organizations that are assisting our fellow citizens in need. Charitable giving is humane; as Bastiat remarked, the welfare state is "phony philanthropy."

If Chris Christie embraces unabashedly and unapologetically the principles of limited government and free enterprise, his next three budgets will reduce spending by billions of dollars. At the end of his first term, state spending should be at least $15 billion lower than it is today. Fiscal conservatism would then be a reality in New Jersey.

Murray Sabrin is professor of finance at Ramapo College. He was the Libertarian Party nominee for governor in 1997 and a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in 2000 and 2008. Check www.MurraySabrin.com for more of his writings.

ALSO BY MURRAY SABRIN:

Too much government undermines prosperity in N.J.

Should N.J. profit from Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme?

N.J. consolidation: How about creating the City of Bergen?

N.J. Tea Party makes respectable showing in primaries

Christie should articulate a free enterprise agenda for N.J.

Rand Paul is right, Rachel Maddow is wrong: anti-discrimination laws discriminate

Rand Paul's landslide and Richard Blumenthal's lies

N.J. ‘Millonaire's Tax' is just shameless legal plundering by Trenton

Christie's micromanaging N.J.; free the cities and suburbs instead

Police in N.J. make more than teachers but Christie not asking for their ‘shared sacrifice'

Privatize N.J. public schools and let the teachers run them

Millionaires for higher taxes are wrong

Repeal Bergen County's blue laws, but Christie shouldn't expect to raise a single dollar for New Jersey

Gov. Christie gets a B+ for his N.J. budget address

Murray Sabrin: N.J. privatization task force should recommend nonprofit, tuition-based public schools

Murray Sabrin: End-of-life care needs a national dialogue

Murray Sabrin: Gov. Christie should end pensions for all the state's politicians

Murray Sabrin: Independents controlling political winds

 
Comments (4)
NJ
4 Friday, 26 November 2010 01:00
C.R.
Christie is no conservative!
3 Saturday, 03 July 2010 15:14
Not your kids, my kids...our kids.
In your article you mention that if upper income towns want to spend more on municipal spending, then let them do so. Yea that's great but you fail to address a huge repercussion of such a practice, it further widens the gap of quality education between the haves and have nots. If our children are to compete in this global society for job success and establishment, they need the best that is offered to them. Money makes a world of difference in education. Field trips, highly qualified teachers, resources, technology, cutting edge equipment and safe and nurturing environments are what scholarly research shows to be consistently effective in providing excellent education. Those children that come from nothing have to compete with the rich kid who gets more just by virtue of being rich. Then add to that the possibility of the richer towns overriding the tax cap and providing a much better school system and voila!, status quo of the rich staying rich and the poor staying poor on repeat. The Civil Rights Act states that all children have the right to an adequate education. Remember Brown vs, Board?? yea well our schools are less integrated now than they were following the ruling of the famous anti segregation case.Gov Christie is a proponent for vouchers that will allow families that aren't even poor to take their kids to schools that are either parochial schools(separation of church and state not happening here) or a school of their choice. This usually means White families take their kids and put them in less "diverse" schools. I love how politicians express faux expertise on educational issues. Just cause I can read a contract doesn't make me a lawyer, or just cause I can bandage a wound shouldn't make me a doctor, YET politicians and lawmakers seem to think they know exactly how schools should be run and how teachers should do their jobs. Such an insult. At one point Chris Christie is even quoted as saying something along the lines of quality education begins and ends in the classroom. That's a lie and not a single education researcher would support that, unless of course you work in the Christie administration. A child's attitude & disposition to education is strongly influenced by what's happening in the home and how involved parents are. Studies even suggest, how many books found in a child's home greatly effects literacy in the early years. Furthermore,). Hart and Risley's (1995) study of 42 families indicated that children living in families receiving welfare heard approximately 10 million words by age three, whereas children in families in which parents were classified as professional heard approximately 30 million words in the same period. These are just a few of the ways teachers in inner cities are already challenged with students who have less & perform worse than their more affluent counter parts. These children need more than the kids that come from more stable homes and safe neighborhoods and while the schools can't undo disenfranchisement that's ravaged communities of color numerous for decades, they can do their best by offering these kids what ALL kids deserve, the best in education, because the reality is, education is their only way out of what seems to be the all too familiar vicious cycle of poverty. If you think education is expensive, try ignorance.
2 Thursday, 01 July 2010 06:11
tom1951
About time sombody with some common sense is getting involved in this mes called New Jersey budget! Get rid of welfare,solcial security fraud,disablity fraud and the politicians that refuse to adress these wastes of tax payers monies.You get my vote for govenor.
1 Wednesday, 30 June 2010 16:57
Zeppo
is your ph.d really in "economic geography?" And, what is economic geography anyway? Is it comparable to a geography department ph.d granted in marijuana studies? Cause while I don't know you, your theroretical foundation for and applications of your analysis sure makes me wonder.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:

NVE-1134_NVE_300x250

Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**