BY BONNIE WATSON COLEMAN
COMMENTARY
What could you do with $48,000?
You could, among other things, buy a 2009 Mercedes-Benz sport utility vehicle.
Now, let's say that new SUV kept breaking down, and each time you towed it to the mechanic, it cost you $48,000 to fix. Despite that, you readily paid the bill over and over again.
Would that make sense? Of course not.
It would be illogical, wasteful and reckless. No one in their right mind would support such irresponsible spending, yet unfortunately, that's what New Jersey taxpayers do every year — over and over again — when it comes to our prisons.
About 14,000 inmates are annually released from New Jersey correctional facilities, with 65 percent of adults re-arrested within five years. Taxpayers pay about $48,000 per year per inmate.
The idea that we would willingly continue to fork over $48,000 in taxpayer money per year for every inmate and find that acceptable is hard to comprehend. This waste cannot continue, and as we look to save money, stopping it is the moral and smart thing to do.
That's why I held hearings throughout the state to hear from as many people as possible on the failings of our prison system, and that's why I was joined by five of my colleagues in introducing a six-bill package to reform how prisons handle inmates, with the goal being to cut recidivism and save lives and taxpayer money.
Many of our laws deal with meting out harsh penalties for lawbreakers, and we spend enormous sums of money to ensure criminals in New Jersey pay their debt. Yet, we have created a system that doesn't just punish criminals. It punishes taxpayers too.
We've already pushed forward a law to give judges more discretion in some drug cases prosecuted through the Drug-Free School Zone law. That law's mandatory minimum sentences have given New Jersey this dubious distinction: 35 percent of all inmates are nonviolent drug offenders, the highest percentage in the nation.
It makes more sense to keep these nonviolent offenders out of prison in the first place, sending them instead into drug treatment. This is not to say that these individuals do not deserve to be punished, but incarcerating individuals over and over again is not the answer.
Many families and communities are struggling with the devastating effects of incarceration, including children coping with the absence of parents and young people returning from prison without education and job training skills.
These problems all cost money to address.
If we are serious about reducing crime and reforming the portions of our corrections system that just don't work — and saving taxpayers money — then we need to look at re-entry services.
We spend over $1.2 billion — 4.2 percent of our total state budget — on our Department of Corrections. We also spend more than $300 million to keep our nonviolent drug offenders behind bars. That's more than 16 states spend on their entire corrections systems.
I am confident that, after almost a year of exhaustive research, we have put together a legislative package that will create a system that better serves our communities and those who have paid their debts to society.
The legislation would require the state to create mandatory workforce-skills training and a mandatory education program in each state correctional facility, with inmates required to attain a high school equivalency certificate or high school diploma.
It would also eliminate inmate phone surcharges that are simply bad policy and make it difficult for inmates to maintain family and community ties.
I estimate the package would cost about $12 million per year, but an analysis by the nonpartisan Office of Legislative Services shows cutting New Jersey's recidivism rate by 5 percent would save taxpayers as much as $13.44 million in just two years.
Some have called this legislation reckless, or deliberately mischaracterized it. Some have enjoyed humoring themselves with rants defending the status quo of wasted taxpayer money and wasted lives. But these reforms would be among the smartest moves we could make to save taxpayer dollars.
Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-Mercer) is the Assembly majority leader and represents the 15th Legislative District.
Twitter
Myspace
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Slashdot
Furl
Yahoo
Technorati
Newsvine
Facebook
Difficult to do? Of course not ! THE MONEY IS ALREADY THERE, ALL THAT IS MISSING IS THE RESOLVE!
The Corrections Department spent $1.1 Billion last fiscal year.
Here is where you cna start finding some money:
Riverfront State Prison closed. Around 300 Custody personnel were transferred to the other 13 prisons. All of the other prisons were already staffed at 100% for custody staff. With all of these extra people you would think that overtime costs would be reduced. Wrong! Through incompetent administrative practices none of these transferred personnel were figured into a plan to reduce overtime. They were simply "added" in to the already filled areas. In addition you would think that if one of your 14 prisons closed you would see 1/14 of your costs be reduced. Wrong! Not a single dime has been saved with the closure of Riverfront State prison.
The Bloated Central Office Bureaucracy. The Department has 13 prisons. Each is staffed with the normal Human Resource,employee relations, classification,etc. departments. They all have Administrators, Asst. Administrators,Asst. Superintendents etc. But add to this a whole "city" of Bureaucrats located at what is called " Central Office" in Trenton. Hundreds and hundreds of people,some who are important to the smooth functioning of the department but most who if they disappeared would never have an effect on the actual jail operations,make the DOC a very expensive operation. The Department does not need all of the Deputy Commissioners, Asst. Commissioners,Directors,etc. to "run" 13 jails. A study of the 2009 Organizational Chart shows 42 different areas of supervision,and that DOES NOT INCLUDE the bureaucracy in place at the 13 jails.
Custody Bureaucracy and overtime . The Federal jail system has two layers of custody supervision. New Jersey has four. There are Chiefs,Captains,Lieutenants,and Sergeants. That should be changed eventually. What should be changed immediately to save millions of dollars in overtime is an archaic employee rule that is in effect no where else in the State. Supervisors in State government either do not get overtime or they get what is known as "comp time " . This compensation time is an hour for hour "pay" in lieu of cash. Work 8 hours overtime and get 8 hours credited for you to take off at another time .This comp time can never be "cashed in " for money. But in Corrections two supervisor groups ,the Lieutenants and Sergeants ,,get cash payments for overtime worked. They are the only supervisors in the State that get this benefit and it is costly. What is even worse is that Lieutenants are allowed to "break back" and work a Sergeants overtime shift! This is such a well kept perk that few if any have ever questioned it.