newjerseynewsroom.com

Sunday
Aug 05th

Your beneficiary designations should reflect your will, not contradict it

A common estate planning mistake

BY MARY ELLEN HANCOCK

A comprehensive estate plan is a financial planning necessity. If done correctly, it should provide you with a clear — and tax-efficient — plan for leaving a legacy to your loved ones and favorite charitable organizations.

Many people don’t realize, however, that any beneficiary designations they indicate on bank or brokerage account forms, for example, could contradict and supersede certain instructions outlined in their will.

Yes, that’s right—supersede. Over the years, I have seen some clients make this mistake and it can have unintended and unwanted effects. For example, you could disinherit a loved one or create a negative tax situation—precisely those consequences that you and your advisors took great pains to avoid in the drafting of your estate plan. Working closely with your financial advisor, care should be taken to ensure that your will and beneficiary forms are coordinated and reflect your true wishes.

Here’s what could go wrong. Adding a Transfer on Death (TOD) or Payable on Death (POD) beneficiary designation on your bank or brokerage accounts, for example, could result in the funds being passed outright to your beneficiaries, effectively cancelling any benefits that would have been realized had the assets passed through a trust (as outlined in your will). This, in turn, could result in your assets not being handed down exactly how you originally intended, e.g., your minor children receiving large amounts of money at a young age.

When you are faced with beneficiary forms outside of the will and trust documents that you and your advisor(s) have carefully crafted, contact your advisor(s) before making any beneficiary designation changes. He or she can counsel you accordingly. You don’t want to inadvertently nullify your original — and true — intentions for your wealth after you are gone.

Mary Ellen Hancock, CFP®, is a financial advisor with Brinton Eaton, an SEC-registered investment management firm in Madison, N.J. She can be reached at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or 973-984-3352. For more information, visit www.brintoneaton.com.

 

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:

Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

Children can be conned out of inheritance after multiple marriages

BY CAROL ABAYA NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM THE SANDWICH GENERATION Multiple marriages and blended families can mean children get cheated out of money and assets their parent(s) earned and had before the second or third marriage. At the 2012 senior citizens’ law day conference, Lawrence A. Friedman, Bridgewater elder law attorney, said elders need to protect their children of prior marriages from being disinherited. "Even if your spouse’s current will provides for your children, your spouse may change it after you pass away,” he said. In addition to protecting one's child, an appropriate will can minimize N.J. estate taxes, which kick in if assets are over $675,000. At the conference, Cathyanne Pisciotta from North Brunswick discussed guardianship which could be necessary if various legal documents are not signed. Pisciotta said that if a person does not have a durable power of attorney (for financial affairs) and a living will (for medical decisions), anyone else can seek guardianship of that person. An expensive court proceeding is mandatory. And she said, “If one person seeks guardianship, someone else can challenge the appointment. Another relative may seek to be appointed guardian because he/she wants the money and power.”

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com


**V 2.0**