newjerseynewsroom.com

Tuesday
Feb 21st

The Real Reason for the Cancelation

While there is truth to his mother's illness, it is not the reason the show's tapings were cancelled. The show was given court orders to stop taping. Evidently, a highly publicized political figure filed legal complaints and the show was given a cease and desist order. The show is fulfilling it's legal obligation to this court order and the legal team is defending the alleged charges and quickly as possible. The Colbert Report will resume taping as soon as legally possible.

 
Comments (11)
11 Sunday, 19 February 2012 14:28
Colbert Report Insider
"...a person who has a business relationship with the show said that Colbert’s mother is seriously ill..."

"...Colbert did not want anyone to know what was happening."

What article did you guys read? The news of Lorna Colbert's illness was reported by the Huffington Post, not by Stephen Colbert, nor by anyone affiliated directly with the show.

Stephen did not want the news of his mother's illness to be public. As stated before, there is some truthiness to his mother's condition. It is not the reason for the cancelled tapings. That is what the Huffington Post is reporting. That is what newjerseynewsroom.com is repeating, along with dozens of other news outlets. There is an entirely different reason for the cancelled tapings. The show will resume Monday, and the truth will be revealed.
10 Sunday, 19 February 2012 02:15
colbert fan
OK, let me get this straight "insider". You thought what would be "funny" would be to post a lie, coming from a 'colbert insider', that Stephen is lieing and is on hold for legal reasons.....while in actual fact it is really due to the potentially serious health issues of his mother. I'm lost as to why you thought that would be funny! It appears you did it to make yourself feel important..... that you had this "insider" knowledge. Is your life really so pathetic that this is the only way you can feel important? Honestly get a life ! My best wishes go out to Stephen and his family during this difficult time.
9 Saturday, 18 February 2012 21:30
who cares
whoever you are, learn the first law of grammar: know the difference betwenn 'its' and 'it's' your quote says, " ... show is fulfilling it's legal obligation.."
8 Saturday, 18 February 2012 20:57
Maury Mills
As another attorney, I would like to weigh in and agree with the comment to ignore the post that Mr. Colbert was being legally prohibited from continuing with his show. It would be a prior restraint, as pointed out the chances of which being ordered astronomical against and as also pointed out, a matter of public record. It seems the author cannot accept that Mr. Colbert is simply (as others point out) putting what is really important, his family, first. Not surprising, notwithstanding his acerbic public persona, that he is at his core, a great human being.
7 Saturday, 18 February 2012 19:36
Jessie Marie
Very well put. I agree.............
6 Saturday, 18 February 2012 18:02
Takamura
"Eh, dude was being funny and you guys fell for it"

He may have been trying to be funny...
5 Saturday, 18 February 2012 17:59
Takamura
"Eh, dude was being funny and you guys fell for it"

He may have been trying to be funny... he didn't succeed.
4 Saturday, 18 February 2012 17:57
Takamura
Since you provide no proof or details, I'm going to go ahead and ignore this.

BTW:
"alleged charges"

Charges aren't alleged. They are the allegations themselves.

"Evidently"
I do not think that word means what you think it means... there is no evidence here, just an allegation
3 Saturday, 18 February 2012 17:55
heh heh
Eh, dude was being funny and you guys fell for it
2 Saturday, 18 February 2012 14:53
Truth Seeker
Judging by his "hit piece"8Sb4 comment with no facts or evidence, I think this so-called "Colbert Report Insider" is perfectly suited for a job at Fox News.
1 Saturday, 18 February 2012 13:38
An Attorney
A cease and desist from a politician would relate to some specific bit on the show, rather than the entire program. Even were that not the case, such a court order would be preceded by a hearing, the order (not to mention the hearing, depending on the jurisdiction) would be open and matters of public record (therefore readily available to entertainment reporters who check these things routinely), and the potential for harm to the plaintiff would have to be astronomical before any court would issue such an order in this context. This all puts aside the fact that in Mr. Colbert's eyes, the filing of such a complaint would be comedy gold (before a hearing had time to take place). So... not likely.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:

Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**