newjerseynewsroom.com

Saturday
Sep 11th

Christie Whitman: Terrorists and terrorist actions are acts of war and should be treated as such

WhitmanHT121309_optBY CHRISTIE WHITMAN
COMMENTARY

With the failed attack on Northwest Flight 235 on Christmas Day, the nation once again turned its eyes towards our security at home.

The insecurity that we all felt after Sept. 11, 2001, has returned in some measure, combined with relief that the recent attempt to destroy a plane and its passengers headed for the United States was unsuccessful. Questions remain as to how the perpetrator could have gotten on the plane in the first place.

The Christmas Day bomber, the recent security fiasco at Newark Liberty International Airport and the terrorist trial soon to take place in downtown Manhattan have people across the country wondering how we deal with this new world we face.

Terrorists and terrorist actions are acts of war and should be treated as such. Why are we treating the underwear bomber as if he were a run-of-the-mill thwarted murderer? What kind of deal has the Obama administration put on the table to get him to talk? Was he truly Mirandized and what does that mean for our ability to get information?

Even the tone in describing the thwarted attack missed the mark. It's hard to justify using the legal term "allegedly" when talking about Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. This terrorist proudly proclaimed his instruction from al-Qaida to carry out the attack.

For that, he should face stiff consequences.

I should say from the outset that I do not condone torture. The United States signed the Geneva Conventions because we believed torture was outside the bounds of civilized nations. We did not want our soldiers tortured and we did not believe that the information gained from torture was always reliable.

We did, however, recognize that war was different from domestic criminal activities, so we set up a methodology to deal with enemy combatants with different approaches for those in and those out of uniform.

We live in a complicated world where we are facing an enemy like none before. Fighting a war against a group that is not a nation-state presents a host of complicating issues, including where to draw traditional battle lines.

The answers to how to deal with these challenges are not as straightforward as many would have us believe, but that does not mean they can be ignored, nor should they be taken lightly.

The government has to do a better job of defining what constitutes acts of war given the current tactics used by our enemies. We must be clear on how terrorists will be handled, and whether or not we think there is a difference between someone claiming jihad and an up-front terrorist.

We must have a generally accepted protocol in place and that need not include all the rights given a U.S. citizen accused of a domestic crime. U.S. citizens caught while trying to commits acts of war should be treated as combatants.

Unfortunately, while trying to establish that the United States is a country of morals, this administration seems to be floundering in how to deal with our enemies. By not sending a strong signal as to who and what we are and what we will and will not tolerate, we are portraying ourselves as rudderless and presenting an even more inviting target to our enemies.

The belief held by many was that electing Barack Obama president would make us immediately more respected around the world. And, while it is true that President Bush was disliked in many segments of the world as a result of his policy toward Iraq, Obama's election has not quelled the ideological — and sometimes radical — disagreements many have with our country.

To be sure, Obama has a lot on his plate, but that comes with the job. He needs to find a way to demonstrate his resolve and fortitude on issues of domestic security, and make it clear to our enemies that we will find no mercy for acts of terror against the United States of America.

Christie Whitman was the 50th governor of New Jersey and the first female to head the state (1994-2001). She ran the Environmental Protection Agency from 2001 to 2003.

ALSO BY CHRISTIE WHITMAN

Christie Whitman: Health care reform needs responsible fiscal policy for the sake of our grandchildren

Christie Whitman: Consider separation of church and state when addressing gay marriage issue

Christie Whitman: I know Chris Christie can turn New Jersey around, and here's some advice to help

Christie Whitman: Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama still has more to achieve at home and abroad

Both sides need to respect debate on health care reform

When are voters going to decide enough is enough?

Whitman: Rushed legislation is rarely good legislation

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 12 January 2010 18:10 )  
Comments (2)
2 Tuesday, 12 January 2010 12:50
Bad Ideas
Geeky Dad is right. The slippery slope is the slide to failure. Here's why.

The fight against Terrorism is not like a fight a against Germany or Japan. Germany and Japan are nations with set boundaries and tangible infrastructure. The U.S. defeated these enemies by physically destroying their capability to wage war. Terrorism is an idea with no boundaries and no infrastructure. The acts that terrorists engage in - large or small - are more akin to criminal activities performed by crooks rather than "acts of war" performed by nation-states.

On the one hand, yes, it makes me sick that by affording these criminals a fair trial they will get a platform for their loathsome ideologies, but on the other hand, if we're confident in our moral standing and we don't resort to hypocrisy when it comes to our values (read torture or Guantanamo), the world will come around and see "terrorist acts" as they should be seen - not as the actions of valiant freedom-fighters but as the acts of a bunch cowardly criminals like the mob or the drug cartels.

If 'Terrorism" succeeds in making the US abandon its values - what makes us the greatest nation on earth - it means that these criminals have succeeded in defeating us.

Ms. Whitman would do best to stop using terrorism is a means to attack the current administration for short-term political gain. As a member of the administration that has done the most to undermine American values in the world, she has no place to criticize anyone about this fight. She should be ashamed of herself.
1 Tuesday, 12 January 2010 11:23
GeekyDad
By excepting some acts from the usual justice track by putting them under the heading of "terrorism," we create a slippery slope. What about that guy who's accused of walking into a church and killing an abortion doctor at point blank range? Why is that not terrorism? Or the D.C. snipers -- why is that not an act of war? I hate the idea of the Christmas Day bomber using our courts as a platform for his political ideology. But I hate the alternatives even more.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


MIKE SCOTT EDITORIAL CARTOONS ––click on the image for Mike's archives––

NVE-1134_NVE_300x250

Follow/join us

Facebook Group: /#/pages/Montclair-NJ/New-Jersey-Newsroom/74298523155?ref=ts Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509 Contact NJNR: contacts

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**