newjerseynewsroom.com

Sunday
Jan 01st

‘Wretches & Jabberers’: Movie review and trailer

wretches040111_optAutism documentary features rejected process of facilitated communication

BY MIRIAM RINN
NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM
MOVIE REVIEW

In 1993, PBS’s documentary series “Frontline” did a show on facilitated communication, a process where an assistant, or facilitator, helps someone who cannot speak clearly express himself via keyboard. The facilitator sits very close to the speechless person, guiding his arm or hand to type out messages. Most of the people using facilitated communication in the show suffered from autism, a condition that often leaves people unable to speak.

The “Frontline” program suggested strongly that the process was a fraud, that the facilitators were either consciously or unconsciously manipulating the arms of the people to type out messages that they, the facilitators, wanted them to express. Evidence of that included the fact that the communications were poems, long, complex sentences, and sophisticated concepts, even for very young children. Most medical associations and advocacy organizations rejected the process as well, calling it unscientific and unproven. (Disclosure: My son is a BCBA who trains teachers to work with children with autism.)

The Syracuse University professor of special education who introduced facilitated communication to the U.S., Douglas Bilken, is the producer of the new documentary, “Wretches & Jabberers.” The film follows Tracy Thresher and Larry Bissonette, two middle-aged men with autism, and their long-time assistants as they travel to Thailand, Japan, and Finland, advocating for people with autism and expressing themselves through facilitated communication. Both men live in Vermont. Larry, the calmer and gentler of the two, lives with his sister. We see him prepare breakfast for her — coffee and pancakes — in what appears to be a loving way. Tracy, who spent many years institutionalized, has no permanent home, but travels among temporary spaces, sometimes ending up in a state emergency shelter.

The film focuses almost entirely on Larry and Tracy, their assistants, and the people they meet on their travels. There are no medical experts or talking heads filling in background. Director Gerardine Wurzburg doesn’t explain why Tracy cannot live independently or find a permanent residence. Indeed, the film contains almost no information about autism, which is a spectrum disorder, or the widely different symptoms people with autism may exhibit. It doesn’t explain why Larry and Tracy need anyone to guide their hands, yet we always see their assistants right next to them, often holding an elbow or a forearm. After all, if Larry can make coffee in the morning and paint in the afternoon (he’s an artist), why can’t he manage a keyboard or some other speech-augmenting device?

As Larry and Tracy visit autism advocates in foreign countries (all of whom also express themselves through facilitated communication), we hear them “say” the same things over and over. Tracy always talks about his hidden intelligence and his anger at being categorized as mentally retarded. Larry likes to deliver inspirational messages to the conference crowds about perseverance and treating people with disabilities with respect. One of the men types out “Autism is not abnormality of brain, but abnormality of experience.“ The men don’t seem to have much to say about the different sights and sounds and foods they are experiencing, even though you’d expect a place like Thailand to seem very strange to a Vermonter. Larry exhibits a sense of humor at times, as well as childish intransigence when it comes to new foods.

It’s difficult to judge “Wretches & Jabberers.” As a documentary, it’s peculiarly uninformative. Someone who knows nothing about autism, its symptoms, and its treatments will learn very little. We hear almost nothing from the parents of the autistic young adults, or from their teachers, if they have any. As a film, it seems repetitive; every visit is basically the same. Larry and Tracy land in a different place, have their problems adjusting, meet some people with autism who use facilitated communication, and deliver the same message at a conference. Wurzburg never mentions that FC is controversial, that many scientists believe it’s a fraud, or that some have found it useful. She does capture the warmth between the two men, however, which is touching, and their occasional delight.

Unlike most documentaries, this film is getting a big opening across the country at AMC theaters through an arrangement between AMC and the Autism Society.

ALSO BY MIRIAM RINN

‘Potiche’: Movie review and trailer

‘Of Gods and Men’ movie review: Truly spiritual

‘Carancho’ movie review: Crashing the Oscars

‘Poetry' movie review: A Cannes best screenplay

‘Cold Weather' movie review: A low-key comedy/mystery

‘Kaboom' movie review: Ridiculous and hilarious and surprisingly entertaining

‘Phil Ochs: There but for Fortune' movie review and trailer

‘You Wont Miss Me' movie review with trailer

‘The Tempest': Movie review and trailer

‘Cool It' movie takes on climate change

Movie review: ‘Tiny Furniture'

Movie review: ‘The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest'

‘The Social Network' is a rousing success (with movie trailer)

Michael Imperioli maintains mood of intense intimacy in ‘The Hungry Ghosts' (movie review and trailer)

Movie review: ‘The Freebie' provokes a series of questions (with trailer)

Review: ‘The Hideaway (Le Refuge)' is restricted by its own sentimentality

 
Comments (3)
3 Sunday, 03 April 2011 10:52
Jim Ramsour
I am sorry. A sight that gives 4 thumbs up and no visible sight for a thumbs down is lame. I know people with autism that use FC, and there is no fraud in what they say. There are two sides to everything, and to say that most medical organizations disallow FC is disingenuous.

By disallowing FC, the voices of those with autism that use FC are taken away. Maybe that is the intent
2 Saturday, 02 April 2011 11:44
James T. Todd, Ph.D.
Ms. Rinn:

Thank you for your frank and informative review of "Wretches and Jabberers," the latest installment in the facilitated communication (FC) pseudoscience propaganda juggernaut.

I have met and interacted on multiple occasions with several of the people in the movie, including the main characters. These experiences include having lunch sitting next to Larry Bissonnette, as well as many hours of FC "training" featuring Tracy Thresher, Harvey Lavoy (Thresher's facilitator), Larry Bissonnette, Pascal Cheng (Bissonnette's facilitator), Chammi Rajapatirana, and mother (also his facilitator).

My observations are consistent with your suspicions. I have seen nothing in anything they did to suggest that the typed communications are genuine. What I saw was facilitators controlling the typing. I don't think I just saw what I wanted to see--unless we are to believe that Mr. Rajapatirana, for instance, can type meaningfully while standing up, looking away from the keyboard, and trying to pull his wrist from his mother's grip. Tracy Thresher is perhaps more amazing, being able to type about a video on a screen not visible from his vantage point, but visible to his facilitator. Larry BIssonnette, for his part, seems a very nice man, and not without talents. But when his facilitator was absent, he answered every question with apparently random word repetitions and nodding assent, whether assent was called for or not. Of course, even though every one of these facilitators admits that facilitator control is a problem, none of them seems interested in subjecting their own extraordinary claims to objective testing. They been directly challenged. Apparently, facilitator control only happens to other people.

James Randi FC challenge: http://tinyurl.com/arkag
James Randi "Cruel Farce": http://tinyurl.com/yal738a

A question you might ask is why the Autism Society, which is supposedly in the business of promoting the well-being of people affected by autism, is advertising and profiting from a movie about the single most discredited intervention in the history of developmental disabilities. FC is a technique for which there is not yet, after 30 years, even one methodologically sound, peer-reviewed, objective demonstration of reliability. Dozens of published scientific studies show how and why FC fails. Facilitated Communication is a method which has, tragically, produced more imprisonments due to false accusations of rape than credible scientific demonstrations of effectiveness--the latter number being zero. Shouldn't the Autism Society know better? Shouldn't it be warning people? A note on Autism Society website may explain it all:

"Through the generosity of AMC and Wretches & Jabberers the Autism Society receives 10% of ticket sales."

http://tinyurl.com/3ntevj5

James T. Todd, Ph.D.
Eastern Michigan University
1 Saturday, 02 April 2011 09:01
David Max
Finally, someone with enough intelligence to call FC and, by extension, Wurzburg and Biklen, for what it is: A fraud.

And, oh yes, as a documentary, the film isn't even very good.

Rinn points out all the logical inconsistencies in the film which is nothing new, because such inconsistencies were also to be found in Wurzburg's other film about FC, "Autism is a World."

When will reason and science once again find their way into the human services?

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**