NJEA criticizes Christie for not funding pension system | State | NewJerseyNewsroom.com -- Your State. Your News.

newjerseynewsroom.com

Friday
Oct 24th
  • Login
  • Create an account
    Registration
    *
    *
    *
    *
    *
    REGISTER_REQUIRED
  • Search
  • Local Business Deals

NJEA criticizes Christie for not funding pension system

keshishianbarbara050310_optUnion president says teachers paid their share while state ignore obligations

Gov. Chris Christie‘s proposed changes to public employee pensions and health benefits, including public school teachers have drawn the ire of the president of the New Jersey Education Association.

Barbara Keshishian charged that Christie is attacking middle class workers and that his proposals for cuts in pensions and health benefits, combined with what she described as much higher costs taken out of the pockets of public employees, will hurt thousands of working families.

"And, in typical fashion, he is pointing fingers at everyone else, while refusing to step up and fulfill even his own most basic obligations,'' Keshishian said. "For much of the last decade and a half, the state of New Jersey has failed to make any contributions to the pension funds, allowing a large deficit to grow. Over that same period, teachers and other school employees contributed billions of their own money into the funds, and even increased their contributions in a good faith effort to stabilize the pension funds.

"Now, Governor Christie is making a bad situation worse,'' the teachers‘ union head said. "In February, he removed the pension contribution from Governor Corzine's final budget, returning New Jersey to the days of not funding pensions at all. His current budget contains no pension contribution for the current year.

"Then, in March, he signed pension reform legislation that reduces benefits while requiring the state to slowly begin meeting its obligation, beginning with a minimal payment in 2011,'' Keshishian said. "But Governor Christie has already said he may break his own law by not making any pension contribution next year, either.

"It's impossible to take seriously the governor's claims that he is trying to reform pensions while perpetuating the greatest abuse of all — the absolute failure of the state to do its part, even as public employees have paid their share of pension costs out of every paycheck,'' Keshishian added. "Enough is enough. Governor Christie needs to stop pointing fingers and start funding the pension systems. No other so-called reforms can dig the state out of the hole that he and many of his predecessors have dug."

— TOM HESTER SR., NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM

 
Comments (2)
2 Thursday, 16 September 2010 14:47
Reality
I don't think it is against to law for Companies not to offer a matching contribution (recent laws requied companies to automaticallyenroll employees at a 3% contribution rate).
Regardless, most employers in addition to not giving raises and cutting/eliminating bonuses have reduced the size of the 401K match.
I don't think most people are against teachers receiving a pension, but it is wrong to require them to contribute more and increase service time to receive full benefits? This is still a "defined benefits" plan - so while private employers (may) contribute to 401Ks your benefits are subject to market risk and you only get out what is in your plan.
Personally, I think all elected state and federal officials should have their salaries and benefits slashed as they have failed on their fiscal duty to operate a balanced budget and fund pension/social security (funding on paper but spending money elsewhere doesn't count). That being said, I don't think it is unresonable to have teachers and other public employees close the gap between what is contributed versus the benefits received.
1 Wednesday, 15 September 2010 11:57
Rob From Bordentown
For all those state residents that don't think teachers deserve a pension provided by the state, and that it is ok that the state not contribute it's share to the pension fund, how would you feel if your private sector employer refused to contribute their company match to your 401K plan? You wouldn't like it very much, and in fact they couldn't get away with it, their contribution is required by law.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:

Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509