At the risk of being harshly denigrated here, I have to say I side with the business.
Although a tragic incident has occurred in the life of Jackie Genovese, it is not the result of any actions on the part of 'Diane & Co' and they can't be made to take a financial hit every time one of their customers has a personal tragedy. It's clear they have a "no refund" policy, yet did make an offer to extend store credit ... something that many stores will enforce on returns.
Let's also be clear about one more thing. A teenager who has the means to purchase a $1200 dress very surely has the means to access other funds. We aren't discussing destitute people here.
It's sad to say, but from the history this person had with an attempt to return her dress, it seems she is using this tragedy as a means to prompt public outcry to achieve her goal of getting her money back.
That to me is the real miscarriage here ... the manipulation of public sentiment for purely selfish reasons.
Twitter
Myspace
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Slashdot
Furl
Yahoo
Technorati
Newsvine
Facebook
I agree. Even 16 year old girls who buy dresses at stores with 'no refund' policies.
I agree that she entered into a sort of contract when she purchased the dress, but their behavior at the store is unjustifiable. Even if the girl was a fussy customer, running a business is running a business, and you have to be prepared to suffer consequences when making bad decisions. Keep the $1200, but it'll cost you the thousands from other potential customers who will now take their money elsewhere.