newjerseynewsroom.com

Tuesday
Jun 26th

U.S. Senator Bob Menendez facing a tough road

steinbergalanj021610_optBY ALAN J. STEINBERG
NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM
COMMENTARY

This has not been a good political year for U.S. Senator Bob Menendez (D-New Jersey). A June 17, 2010 Quinnipiac Poll reported that New Jersey voters disapproved of Menendez by a 43-38 percentage, his highest disapproval rating ever.

For Bob Menendez, however, the worst news may be yet to come. He faces two political quagmires, to wit; 1) the California U.S. Senate race, in which Menendez is involved in his capacity as chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC); and 2) the failure of President Barack Obama and the Democratic-controlled Congress to date to extend the tax cuts enacted under the leadership of President George W. Bush in 2001 and 2003. These tax cuts expire on December 31, 2010.

The California gubernatorial and U.S. Senate races are by far the most significant contests of Election Year 2010. The GOP has a real chance to score a "two-fer". If Meg Whitman defeats former Governor Jerry Brown in the gubernatorial race and Carly Fiorina unseats incumbent U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer, this would put the GOP in an excellent position to win California's 55 electoral votes in the 2012 Presidential race. No Republican Presidential candidate has carried California since George H.W. Bush did so in 1988. If the GOP Presidential candidate carries California in 2012, it will be virtually impossible for Obama to be reelected.

The California Field Poll last week showed both races to be a virtual dead heat. This is an anti-incumbent, change year, however, and both Whitman and Fiorina must be rated as favorites at this point. For California voters, Jerry Brown is "old hat", and Barbara Boxer symbolizes all the failures of the Washington political leadership establishment.

It certainly is not the fault of Bob Menendez that Barbara Boxer is in deep political trouble in the Golden State. He volunteered for the DSCC chair position, however, and a Boxer loss would doubtless result in a major loss of influence for Menendez on Capital Hill.

There is another potential factor that could make a Boxer loss most galling for Bob Menendez. At present, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is the hottest Republican political property in the nation. It is virtually certain that both Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina will invite him to campaign for them.

If he accepts their invitation, Christie would be an absolutely spectacular California campaign success. His high octane, passionate style is made to order for California campaigns. The California political contests would have a New Jersey side story: A Christie win and a Menendez loss.

While a Barbara Boxer loss in the California 2010 Senate race would result in a decline of the Washington stature of Bob Menendez, the failure of the Obama administration and the Democrat-controlled Congress to extend the Bush tax cuts would destroy his chances of being reelected in 2012.

A failure to extend the Bush tax cuts would result in 2011 in the largest tax increase in the history of the United States of America. The impact of this increase would fall disproportionately on New Jersey taxpayers, whose average dollar incomes are higher than those of other states, necessitated by the higher cost of living in the Garden State.

If Menendez has any doubt as to how this massive tax hike would cripple his reelection campaign, he need only consult with his fellow New Jersey Democratic U.S. Senator Frank Lautenberg. When the Democratic-controlled Congress passed the tax increases requested by the then President Bill Clinton in 1993, Lautenberg voted "no".

Lautenberg understood full well that federal income tax increases always have a disproportionate impact on New Jersey. He realized that a "yes" vote would have almost certainly resulted in a loss of his U.S. Senate seat to Chuck Haytaian in 1994. Frank Lautenberg came into politics from the business world, but he always had remarkably keen political instincts.

During his 2008 campaign for the Presidency, Obama promised to extend the tax cuts for individuals earning less than $200,000 and families that make less than $250,000. There are now less than six months left before the tax cuts expire, and Obama has failed thus far to make good on his promise.

For Bob Menendez, however, even the enactment of Obama's proposal prior to the end of 2010 would still not prevent his reelection defeat. A family making $250,000 per year in New Jersey can be considered upper middle class, but not wealthy. In addition to hiking income taxes for all families earning more than $250,000, the Obama proposal would increase the maximum capital gains rate from 15% to 20%, and the maximum dividend rate from 15% to 39.6%.

This spells doom for Menendez with New Jersey "investor class" voters. Bergen County, for example, which Menendez carried in the 2006 U.S. Senate race, would almost certainly be carried by his Republican challenger. If Obama and the Congress fail to extend the tax cuts for families making less than $250,000, Menendez will suffer massive defections among working class voters who supported him in 2006 as well.

All this makes Bob Menendez most vulnerable in 2012. Frank Lautenberg also fared poorly in the June 17, 2010 Quinnipiac Poll, registering a 40-47 percent disapproval rate. He will be 90 years old in 2014, however, when he is up for reelection. Unless the New Jersey Democratic Party establishment members think a nonagenarian Lautenberg can become the Garden State's answer to Strom Thurmond, they will likely maneuver to have him replaced by a younger, more viable candidate.

All of which makes the 2012 New Jersey U.S. Senate race a most inviting one for potential Republican challengers — the best chance the Republicans have had to win a U.S. Senate seat in New Jersey during the past three decades.

Alan J. Steinberg served as Regional Administrator of Region 2 EPA during the administration of former President George W. Bush. Region 2 EPA consists of the states of New York and New Jersey, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and seven federally recognized Indian nations.

ALSO BY ALAN J. STEINBERG

Chris Christie's N.J. property tax cap proposal: A political masterstroke by the Governor

A conservative, but not a movement conservative — And that is a Christie asset

A Meadowlands Super Bowl could be an NFL — and New Jersey — debacle

Opposition to value added tax, not ObamaCare, is best N.J. GOP congressional election issue

Israeli ‘Settlements': A New Jersey story

N.J. School Budget Elections: The New Christie Paradigm is triumphant

Alan Steinberg: Chris Christie will achieve three historic fiscal objectives

A bipartisan consensus on nuclear energy

Alan Karcher's challenge and Gov. Chris Christie's paradigm shift

 
Comments (4)
4 Sunday, 24 October 2010 10:25
Jack Martin
Having lived in California, I can safely say that neither Whitman nor Fiorina would represent CA. They can represent the folksy Tea partain but not californians.
3 Saturday, 17 July 2010 02:39
Bobby
Why are Republicans still touting the Bush Tax Cut. It was a huge waste of money to begin with, and some good it did for the economy.
2 Thursday, 15 July 2010 11:35
paulina
Oh yeah, poor little rich babies. Boo hoo. You want to cut taxes for rich people and increase taxes on the poor (ex. cutting EITC tax credit for the working poor). Yup, we know what your priorities are, go cry me a river in your Dior handkerchief.
1 Wednesday, 14 July 2010 16:33
James P
For the vast majority of New Jerseyans who don't earn anywhere near $250,000 per year, the GOP in 2010 is ideologically bankrupt, the Party of No. Someone shilling for Republican candidates like this columnist can only resort to the techniques of propaganda. How else to argue for putting back in power the party that wrecked the economy?The editors should at least give equal space to someone who can (quite easily) counter the factual omissions and distortions. The reader can then make up his/her own mind.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

Children can be conned out of inheritance after multiple marriages

BY CAROL ABAYA NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM THE SANDWICH GENERATION Multiple marriages and blended families can mean children get cheated out of money and assets their parent(s) earned and had before the second or third marriage. At the 2012 senior citizens’ law day conference, Lawrence A. Friedman, Bridgewater elder law attorney, said elders need to protect their children of prior marriages from being disinherited. "Even if your spouse’s current will provides for your children, your spouse may change it after you pass away,” he said. In addition to protecting one's child, an appropriate will can minimize N.J. estate taxes, which kick in if assets are over $675,000. At the conference, Cathyanne Pisciotta from North Brunswick discussed guardianship which could be necessary if various legal documents are not signed. Pisciotta said that if a person does not have a durable power of attorney (for financial affairs) and a living will (for medical decisions), anyone else can seek guardianship of that person. An expensive court proceeding is mandatory. And she said, “If one person seeks guardianship, someone else can challenge the appointment. Another relative may seek to be appointed guardian because he/she wants the money and power.”

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com


**V 2.0**