newjerseynewsroom.com

Saturday
Apr 02nd

Why does New Jersey tolerate educational failure at such a high cost to taxpayers?

SabrinM012810_optBY MURRAY SABRIN
COMMENTARY

The New Jersey Supreme Court heard arguments on January 5th about the constitutionality of Governor Christie's state aid cutbacks to the Abbott school districts this year. The $1 billion dollar cut to all school districts included a 100% cut to some suburban school districts. In short, the income tax, which is supposed to provide property tax relief to all homeowners, has become a tool to redistribute income from middle and upper income suburban individual and families to failed urban school districts throughout the state.

The long history of education litigation should be ended and a new paradigm should emerge that would provide a quality education to students, particularly in inner cities. For more than three decades, the Education Law Center has asserted — and argued before the Supreme Court — that more state aid would improve the outcomes in urban school districts. But on January 5th the state Board of Education released results of statewide standardized tests that reveal a widening of the "achievement gap" between inner city students and suburban youngsters.

According to The Star-Ledger, "On that test, about 60 percent of black or African-American third-graders failed to achieve proficient scores, compared to 21.4 percent for Asian students and 31 percent for whites." So do these test results prove that the ELC is right, more money is needed to "close the achievement gap?" Or, do the test results confirm what the critics of the Abbott decision have been asserting for decades, namely, that more money does not "buy" better education for inner city kids?

Whether these test results are indicative of the actual skill sets of inner city youngsters, they are troubling indeed. After spending additional hundreds of millions of dollars on improving the education of inner city students, the question that should be asked is simple: Why do we as a society tolerate so much failure at such an unbelievable high cost to taxpayers?

Like most ills in our society, we need to challenge the status quo, especially in education — where expensive and under performing schools in our state have been the focus of public policy initiatives and litigation for decades. Common sense dictates we must have a dialog about an alternative to government education. As long as Republican and Democratic lawmakers, the Education Law Center, the teachers' union and the Supreme Court believe that the current public school "system" is the optimal way to teach children, taxpayers will be forced to pay for an expensive failed experiment — relying on government to educate inner city children.

Murray Sabrin is professor of finance at Ramapo College. He was the Libertarian Party nominee for governor in 1997 and a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in 2000 and 2008. Check www.MurraySabrin.com for more of his writings.

ALSO BY MURRAY SABRIN:

Will Gov. Christie risk career by spending billions on new Abbott schools?

Alex DeCroce is right about N.J. unemployment benefits

Ron Paul and New Jersey's Mike Doherty should be Republican's presidential ticket for 2012

TSA's Nazi-like tactics should be rejected by Americans

Bergen Record editorial goes against individual liberty

N.J. homeowners are paying more for less than ever before

All ingredients are in place for a collapse of U.S. dollar

Anna Little-Frank Pallone race a bellwether for nation

What is wrong with New Jersey's property taxes? Plenty

American media is on the wrong side of history

Christie should battle N.J. Supreme Court and not NJEA

Christie's no conservative on medical marijuana issue

Zuckerberg's $100 million must lead to total makeover and not just reform of Newark schools

Christie should eliminate New Jersey's income tax

New ‘school choice' law in New Jersey is a gimmick to maintain the public school monopoly

Obama could use a lesson in economics 101

N.J. education reform does not require any more money

Not contributing to N.J. teacher and state worker pensions is the real fraud

Think of Social Security as Bernie Madoff on steroids

Balancing budget on backs of suburban taxpayers hurt Chris Christie's grade for first six months as governor

Christie can cut billions more from N.J. budget if he really believes in limited government

Too much government undermines prosperity in N.J.

Should N.J. profit from Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme?

N.J. consolidation: How about creating the City of Bergen?

N.J. Tea Party makes respectable showing in primaries

Christie should articulate a free enterprise agenda for N.J.

Rand Paul is right, Rachel Maddow is wrong: anti-discrimination laws discriminate

Rand Paul's landslide and Richard Blumenthal's lies

N.J. ‘Millonaire's Tax' is just shameless legal plundering by Trenton

Christie's micromanaging N.J.; free the cities and suburbs instead

Police in N.J. make more than teachers but Christie not asking for their ‘shared sacrifice'

Privatize N.J. public schools and let the teachers run them

Millionaires for higher taxes are wrong

Repeal Bergen County's blue laws, but Christie shouldn't expect to raise a single dollar for New Jersey

Gov. Christie gets a B+ for his N.J. budget address

Murray Sabrin: N.J. privatization task force should recommend nonprofit, tuition-based public schools

Murray Sabrin: End-of-life care needs a national dialogue

Murray Sabrin: Gov. Christie should end pensions for all the state's politicians

Murray Sabrin: Independents controlling political winds

 
Comments (1)
1 Monday, 10 January 2011 14:58
David Sciarra
A point of clarification. The issue now before the Court is not about more funding for urban districts. It's about the providing funding for all public schools across the state at the levels determined by the Legislature and Governor in the School Funding Reform Act of 2008. The SFRA defines in law the resources needed by all children to achieve State academic standards. As the New York Times said, "the state set the education standards that students must meet. The state decided how much money was needed to give each student the chance to meet them." Let's at least get the current funding issue before the Court straight.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


MIKE SCOTT EDITORIAL CARTOONS ––click on the image for Mike's archives––

NVE-1134_NVE_300x250

Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**