Share this
Twitter
Myspace
Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Slashdot
Furl
Yahoo
Technorati
Newsvine
Facebook
Export PDF
Print
E-mail
Pam:
First, the picture you use here represents the image body scanners projected before TSA had privacy filters installed. This is not what the image looks like now. Please use an accurate image so not to confuse your readers. Second, TSA has said they did NOT require the elderly woman to remove her adult diaper. You need to check your facts BEFORE you write an article. And if this woman was so concerned about her mother's dignity, why was she putting her on a plane alone in a soiled diaper?
newjerseynewsroom.com
Tuesday
Jun 05th
Inaccurate
This is a comment on "TSA stands by pat-down of elderly woman and removal of her diaper"
Comments (3)
A person who shall carry, or cause to be carried, a living animal or creature in or upon a vehicle or otherwise, in a cruel or inhumane manner, shall be guilty of a disorderly persons offense and punished as provided in subsection a. of R.S.4:22-17.
CREDIT(S)
Amended by L.1995, c. 355, § 3, eff. Jan. 5, 1996; L.1996, c. 64, § 2, eff. July 12, 1996; L.2001, c. 229, § 2, eff. Aug. 27, 2001.
You're the one who needs to check your facts. The TSA's blatant spin is carefully calculated -- no, they didn't "require" her to remove her diaper, they just threatened her with not flying if she didn't. Nah, that's not coercive.
And quit blaming the victim. You have no idea when that poor woman's diaper was soiled. Maybe she was so terrorized by the TSA goons that she wet herself then and there.
But you've clearly drunk the Kool-Aid. Now be a good little sheeple, and bend over and spread 'em.