newjerseynewsroom.com

Share this Twitter Myspace Digg Del.icio.us Reddit Slashdot Furl Yahoo Technorati Newsvine Facebook Export PDF Print E-mail

I understand how the jurors could say not guilty to 1st degree murder and the death penalty, but how could they say not guilty to man-slaughter? Everyone keeps saying that you need to keep emotions out of this case and decide based on the facts, and I agree to a point, but you shouldn't throw away all good judgment making processes. We have different senses for a reason and they all help to determine how we perceive and analyze things. Just knowing that there were so many lies shows that she did not have her daughters best interest at heart. SO SAD. I hope the Caylee's Law that some states are talking about putting in effect passes. If it were already in place then Casey would have gotten a longer sentence. Even if she is innocent (which I find doubtful) she deserves to serve more time for not helping authorities figure out what happened to her daughter.