newjerseynewsroom.com

Monday
Jan 16th

Arguments against N.J. black bear hunt to be heard in State Appeals court Tuesday

Hunt set for Dec. 5-10 in Northwest Jersey

BY TOM HESTER SR.
NEWJERSEYNEWSROOM.COM

A three-judge state appeals court panel will hear oral arguments Tuesday morning in Trenton in an attempt by animal rights organizations to stop the state Department of Environmental Protection from going ahead with a six-day black bear hunt set to begin Dec. 5.

The case has been brought by the Animal Protection League of New Jersey, the Bear Education and Resource Group and bear advocates Theresa Fritzges and Angela Metler.

Lawyers for both sides expect a decision prior to the start of the hunt.

If the hunt goes forward, it will mark the first time in more than 40 years that New Jersey has held black bear hunts two consecutive years.

As of Tuesay, 6,127 people have applied for hunting permits, down from 7,500 last year when 592 bears were killed. In addition to the hunt, an average of 25 to 30 bears are euthanized by the state annually and an average 86 bears are killed by cars.

The New Jersey Sierra Club also opposes the hunt. Sierra Club Director Jeff Tittel argues the hunt is for recreation and not about reducing the number of bears for the public good.

"The hunt is about dropping the overall population, not going after nuisance bears," Tittel said. "This is just a recreational program."

Wildlife officials argue the hunt is necessary to reduce a black bear population, which they figure now tops 3,400. They estimate nearly 1,000 bears were born over winter and have a survival rate of about 80 percent.

The hunt is set for north of Route 78 and west of Route 287 in Hunterdon County and nearly all of Warren County.

“The Sierra Club has serious concerns with allowing another bear hunt to move forward when 592 bears were harvested in the last hunt,” Tittel said. “The DEP used eliminating aggressive and nuisance bears as a justification for the hunt but now will not disclose the number taken, possibly because the hunt had very little affect on the nuisance bear population.

“Human-bear interactions and bear-related complaints can often be attributed to a singular nuisance bear within a region, living close to homes,” Tittel said. “The bears that ultimately paid the price of the hunt were those living in the forests that do not venture into neighborhoods and communities. Eliminating these docile bears is not part of an effective bear management plan

“The Sierra Club opposes the bear hunt and will continue to fight for a strong bear management plan that actually works,” Tittel added. “The black bear is a symbol that New Jersey still has wild places and should be humanely regulated, not hunted for trophies. The public agrees. The public comments were overwhelmingly against last year’s bear hunt.”

 
Comments (4)
4 Wednesday, 30 November 2011 05:47
Marmatt
The NJOA is sponsored by and for the gun and ammunitions industry. Anthony Mauro of NJOA promotes the sale of weapons on his web site Ammoland.com. The NJOA backed Chris Christie, and it was the Governor's way of saying 'thank you' by facilitating the NJ bear hunt of 2010. For the gun lobby in NJ, it's the 'gift that keeps on giving'.

The arguments presented in court yesterday are the truths that the NJ DEP and Div. of Fish & Wildlife refuse to admit. Inacurate tallying of bear 'nuisance' calls. Trash containment laws are NOT ENFORCED. If they were, bear population control would be achieved and human/bear interactions would be reduced. The Div. of F & W has helped to created a 'failure' in bear management - thereby 'creating' their so-called 'necessity' for a hunt.

The NJ black bear hunt is about dirty politics, gun lobbyists, and intentional failure on the part of a State agency.
3 Tuesday, 29 November 2011 17:16
Jim Stabile
That was one of the most biased bear stories I've read in a while, quotes only a person against the hunt, not a word quoting anyone supporting the hunt and giving the person's reasons. Did you lose the phone number of the DEP spokespersons, Tom? Or are you just following NJ Newsroom's antihunting policy?
2 Tuesday, 29 November 2011 10:44
Priscilla Feral
Sierra Club is correct; shooting random bears -- bating them in the woods with piles of bacon and donuts isn't the same as dealing with so-called nuisance bears.

Bears who bother their human neighbors can be discouraged from hanging around one's property by removing the garbage and food source that lures them, but the NRA doesn't care about that. Gov. Christie doesn't give a hoot about bears drawn to human garbage, or how we can better live with what's left of Nature. Christie's the darling of the NRA and the violence know as NJ's repulsive bear hunt is Christie's fault. It's a recreation to those who think making a rug out of a dead bear displays dominance and know-how, and a crime against Nature to the rest of humanity.

Unleash the animal rights lawyers. Defend bears; they're your clients.

Priscilla Feral
President
Friends of Animals
1 Tuesday, 29 November 2011 06:34
Bill Halpern
Sierra sounds like they are an animal rights group. The writer should have spoken to other groups like the New Jersey Outdoor Alliance. At least the people at NJOA are informed on the topic and understand game management. Sierra has proven to be clueless.

Add your comment

Your name:
Subject:
Comment:


Follow/join us

Twitter: njnewsroom Linked In Group: 2483509

Hot topics

 

NJNR Press Box

 

Join New Jersey Newsroom.com on Twitter

 

Be a Facebook fan of New Jersey Newsroom.com

 

New Jersey Newsroom has plenty of room


**V 2.0**